To: The Ox who wrote (31322 ) 10/30/1998 5:53:00 PM From: diana g Respond to of 95453
<< 'Greenspanesque trap' revisited >> I have to agree that you're right, Michael, in that these meetings are not secret and the potential consequences should be clear to anyone who's watching. Not like when Uncle Alan jumped out from behind a tree swinging that rate cut. Still, I think Slider is correct that if a spokesman for the producers makes the right statement about agreements, etc., it may be cause for a sudden surge in price, and Shorts had better cover fast. In the past, statements have sometimes come on weekends, leading to Monday Gap-Ups. Slider is also correct that Producers have expressed animosity toward Crude Traders, in one instance some months back saying something like 'If they're Short, they'll be lucky to run away with just their pants left.' So I wouldn't be surprised if they would enjoy seeing those who are Short crude take a beating. I'm sure the Producers will try to do what's best for their own interests, but that might well include smacking a bear's nose if the opportunity presented itself. Gives the bear something to think about next time. Of course we don't know what the future holds, but I would not be short here. I admire the boldness of those who are, but think it's a high risk/low potential return play. With this Cape Town meeting still ongoing, more Fed cut(s) looking likely, the market prospering, Middle-East always simmering, Asian recovery seemingly on the horizon, recent moves up with nice volume, etc., OS stocks seem to me to have little downward potential and lots of potential 'Up'. BWDIK? I'm just a simple grrl, and I've been wrong before. regards, diana -Slider --I notice SI's 'spell-check' now accepts 'Greenspanesque'. --- I think that makes you the Thomas Hardy of our time and venue.<G>