Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (6343)	10/31/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 11603

Beauty is ageless...hey..there are some younger faces there...not spring chickens...but hey want the the Emu Class there ...I will not ransom there EMU Ostrih Eggs or even the Roosts at the Fly By from the Peoria Ostrig Farm. LOL ransom note found for ostrig egg under the Vibra Mill! Ostrih, Ostrich, Ostricg Ostrige...Oster Blender Osterizer. Oystershuckerblowitouttayour...That is it- Oysters make ONEact...younger. Which Ostrigehict is spelt right, I wil EDIT...but ( I wil not correct it) Chuca PS- Logic on worst place...the place probably CORRESPONDED with a LOW GRADE SPOT ( IE a RED Spot I do hope and wish and dream and pray!) ( thus, the Blue is the Good Stuff- ie THE HIGH GRADE ORE- why are dense thoughts herein??? Why?) on these NEW maps that are different than the Old Style Bouldger Style EM maps. I forgot the post my SCALE URL to a link on a CLEART BLOW up on the scale of BLUE 12 - Blue 14, 16 that I was keying INTOI in m personal ID ing of good ( Blue ) and Bad ( Red) ( Scale Number on RIGHT SIDE is 44 ) SEE? There are none so blind as those that will not see! You can led a horse to water but you can't make him drink from the Blue Well. Trich or Treat?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (6343)	10/31/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

Larry, sorry for my overreaction, but I didn't see the <g> or <VBG> so I assumed the worst. The thread negativism is catching. <VBG> <<worst place on the property>> I don't think that Maxam ever used the paleo-channel mapping for decision making before, just the drill holes and some of Hewlett's contour mapping based on hole and trenching results. What is very interesting is that the area where Maxam results were poor is at drill hole A-5, right in the red/yellow of the map, bad. What is also enlightening is that previous Hewlett mappings don't necessarily agree with the new technology. I don't know if that's good or bad, but it could help explain some of the past inconsistencies. The 10 hole COC test to be drilled this month will demonstrate the value for the new technology, I cant wait for the results because that could be a key to low cost evaluation of the potential of the other Maxam properties. I view this as potentially seminal for future desert dirt mining, Chuca's new-tech.