To: tero kuittinen who wrote (17478 ) 10/31/1998 5:33:00 PM From: quartersawyer Respond to of 152472
As a newcomer and a relative ignoramus I feel eminently qualified to respond here. No absolute need for big guns, though they'll be along in time . Your assertions of "obfuscation and denial" on the part of CDMA proponents is easily reversible, point by your point: * The "late 80's" (early nineties?) work by a few nordic engineers naturally curious and assigned the task of studying competing proposals as the germ of all expertise on CDMA is obfuscation of the development of the technology. *The "standardization ignored by Qualcomm" defined by the number of current users of GSM obfuscates the genuine attempt by Q to standardize 3G. *W-CDMA choice as "victory" for GSM purveyors, because it was worked on for 10 years proven by conversations with a fellow with five years experience, and persuasion of ETSI by the controlling voters, therefore CDMA only "somehow" has anything to do with Qualcomm... a whole onion of obfuscations. *Nortel, Hitachi, Toshiba, Nokia, Ericcson developing (buying into) W-CDMA undoubtedly with key specs easily convertible within the high probabability of eventual convergence obfuscates the existing gray areas by imposing a false hard demarcation within an undecided issue. *Who implied anything? There was a only a singular, clear request that you display at least a little technical knowledge to back your righteous insistence A party line rehash glued and screwed to arched eyebrow indignation obfuscates the technicals not forthcoming. Etc., etc. and absurd. Have you ever read George Orwell and, who was it.. William Golding? Don't these point blank reversals of reality, these "victories" and "glorious successes" remind you of the unshakeable pure lies, and the strident painted boys ranting in their worship of a pig head? Silly at first, but very nasty after a while. Bruce Nadelson