SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ciena (CIEN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sam who wrote (4793)10/31/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Curtis E. Bemis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12623
 
<FWIW, I saw several large sells on Friday -- coming out of Goldman Sachs >

Remember, Goldielocks was also one of the houses that is in on the
cleanup of LTCM. One of the No-bell tricks was the arbitrage thing
on CIEN-TLAB. Humongous buy on CIEN and shorts on TLAB. Burned bad!!



To: sam who wrote (4793)10/31/1998 7:00:00 PM
From: Jeff Bond  Respond to of 12623
 
I think your scenario is very realistic, and the examples you mentioned are good ones to support your point. GS was a block seller on Friday, but I don't have a handle on whether they were simply lightening their position, or if they were running the system as you mentioned.

I really think they are almost as in the dark on any potential merger as we are, and they have the same uncertainty, only the burden of a LOT more shares. If I was GS, I would be holding steady because the company IS worth more than the current stock price, and any potential merger might provide the necessary means to elevate the price closer to recent levels. One thing is for certain, CIEN is a VERY LONG way away from establishing any new 52 week highs, with $40 being the ceiling for quite some time to come.

I would feel comfortable buying CIEN even at this price, if I was planning on holding it for a year. Their technology is just too good to go unnoticed; either they will eventually win some contracts, or they will get bought out so someone can capitalize on this fact.

Regards, JB