SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (11999)11/1/1998 6:25:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Dwight, your memory is totally shot!!! Have you gone senile?

First off, nobody threatened Marty, the Clintonista.

Compare and contrast: Message 6240803

From: Dwight E. Karlsen Saturday, Oct 31 1998 11:10PM ET
Marty, don't post to me again. This is the second time I'm asking you. If you don't follow my wishes, I'll have to turn you in to Bob for stalking/harassment.

Edit: Yes, you will take orders from me on this subject. I don't debate with people who engage in personal attacks, period. You defy me and you'll be facing a 3 day suspension.


Are you nobody, Dwight? That would be one interpretation, another woudl be that you're a liar. It also seems that you have to post here because you can't debate with yourself. Maybe Bob would like to compare and contrast these two posts, also.

While you're at it, perhaps you'd like to explain how responding, publicly, to posts in a public forum constitutes "stalking" and "harassment". Offhand, I'd say you can dish it out, but you can't take it.



To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (11999)11/1/1998 10:57:00 AM
From: pezz  Respond to of 67261
 
There are over 30,000 posts on the Clinton threads.Pardon me [and Marty] if we didn't see the one you mention. "I'll have you tarred and feathered " sure sounds like a threat in this light.<<as for me challenging StockMan to a fist fight.Not true.I challenged him to a duel weapons of his choice>>.Uhhh excuse me there is a difference here? I don't understand.The point I was making was your silly attempts to resort to violence over something any secure mature person would have ignored.<<It doesn't surprise me that you would scorn the idea that God blessed America>>Typical spin by you Dwight.The idea that I scorned was that you would use "God bless America" to some how validate your position.You were telling everyone how patriotic you are. If you say God bless America in the privacy of your home I respect you for it.[please don't tell me if you do] But to announce it here for everyone to see is to self serving to swallow.
pez