Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Olympus Ventures (OVIS) - Shareholder Cartel -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (60)	11/1/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65

Zonkie, you have a very serious problem recognizing reality. "followa youa (sic)"...? Please find where I make stock recommendations. Good luck, you'll need it. Now, I'll ask you essentially the same question I asked the silly marcos: If you want to post your INNUENDO about me simply because I posted on the rmil threads, why are you not doing the same for all those who posted in support of the stock or squeeze? If you have soooo much time to waste on SI, why don't you "go after" REAL pumpers or hypesters or whatever your term of the day is. There are plenty here, why not spend your time productively? Because I questioned Mike Kugler (a broker who posted most possibly without benefit of approval by his firm's compliance dept.) and Tonto and s martin, they have a personal vendetta toward me. You too, as has marcos, have been sucked into it. Duped by it. I halfway think that because Riley & Pugs (Tonto and s martin's "original targets") are no longer on SI, they've chosen me to "go after" because they still have all this animosity and have to channel it somewhere. Neither one takes kindly to not having their posts and "information" immediately accepted and taken as gospel. So they get angry. Someone told me they thought I should just not respond to the attacks and statements made here on SI. My response to that was, why would I say nothing in response? To me, that would leave the impression that what they said was true, if I said nothing and just wimpered away. But what has been said is not true. And I have challenged each and every one of you - yourself, Tonto, s martin, marcos, Paul Casolo (sp?), etc, etc - to prove your innuendo. No one can. As I also said to marcos, pay attention. Know why it can't be proved? It's simple. You cannot prove someone did what you say when they didn't. You cannot prove someone is what you say when they are, in FACT, not. So please, since you (& the others too) obviously relish "going after" hypesters and pumpers be productive about it and go after REAL ones. It would be helpful to all on SI and you won't look so silly either.