Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (12144)	11/1/1998 7:43:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Bateman is my lone exception. I pulled Who Me. I asked for some clarification as to whether I could respond in kind to some comments he made on another thread and I believe SI banned him. I asked for clarification on the Terms of Use because I was warned I could be banned for responding in kind. Since then, I have not reported anyone else (although I think it may be justified in a few cases) just because they did ban him. I learned from my mistake. JLA PS Admin. never responded to my query and I assume they banned him as a result of my query. They also never have contacted me with any reprimand.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (12144)	11/1/1998 8:15:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

At any rate Michelle, I see nothing has really changed here on this thread. Any attempt at intelligent discourse is quickly greeted with personal attacks and name-calling by Clinton supporters -- after all, they don't have much else in their defense. I didn't post here all last week, and there were 978 or so new messages here since I had last looked here prior to this weekend. Guess I didn't miss much---and that's the problem with your defending personal attacks, (as long as they are on your side, as you said)--nothing of substance ever gets debated. I wonder if perhaps this is the strategy of Clinton supporters--keep the focus off the issues, because there is no defense of Clinton that makes any sense.