SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nihil who wrote (40584)11/1/1998 8:04:00 PM
From: david alexander  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573954
 
So what gives with the huge volume of Friday? This seems the most important indicator of AMD future share price. 13.7 million shares with lots of large blocks. 7 times daily volume. Wouldn't this indicate that resistance levels won't apply with this breakaway volume driving the price? Are we looking at short covering or large institutional interest or something more like a suitor? It seems to me that volume doesn't spike like this without a very significant driver. I can't see a Gateway announcement doing for volume. AMD didn't even hiccup with the PB announcement so why would Gateway push nearly 14 million shares to the Board? I'm betting that Merrill and others just advised their institutional clients to jump in. Compaq also traded huge volume. Any possible linkage for the two?



To: nihil who wrote (40584)11/1/1998 10:12:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1573954
 
RE <how did INTC and AMD do over the last five years>
Professor, certainly you can do the comparison for the sake
of theoretical curiosity, but in practice everything
depends on a time span available in every particular
case. You must be familiar with a saying about variable
mileage... The past is good for bragging but is not
explicitly useful for current projections - I do not
think there is a theorem about smoothness of a stock
price function.