SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A Bottom in perishable commodities?/war stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (42)11/25/1998 7:49:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 178
 
Full story
Does Russia really need food aid? Even
donors ask
10:26 a.m. Nov 25, 1998 Eastern

By Sebastian Alison

MOSCOW, Nov 25 (Reuters) - As even some food
aid donor countries begin to question whether Russia
really needs aid this winter, a Russian agricultural
specialist said there were some areas of specific need
but warned Russian firms could suffer.

''Today there is a fairly urgent need for food aid,''
Andrei Sizov of Russian agricultural consultancy
SovEcon told Reuters. ''Otherwise there's a real
threat that Russia will be left with an underfed army
and unfed prisons.''

He said a poor grain harvest, the lowest in over 40
years, and the fact both the government and grain
trading companies had no money to buy grain meant
aid requests were now unavoidable.

''The state has certain responsibilities,'' he said. ''It
must supply the army, prisons, hospitals. The state
has to guarantee them grain, but cannot buy it on the
internal market.''

On Tuesday U.S. Senate Agricultural Committee
chairman Richard Lugar, returning from a nine-day
trip to Russia, said many Russians had derided a
U.S. aid package as an attempt to offload surpluses
and said many did not expect to need aid.

''This is not a country where a lot of people are
going to starve this winter,'' he said.

Russia's total grain harvest this year is expected to be
43 to 45 million tonnes, Deputy Prime Minister
Gennady Kulik said earlier this month. This is a
massive fall from last year's 88.5 million tonnes.

But a more serious problem is that following a
currency devaluation on August 17, Russia's ability to
pay for imports has been drastically reduced. It
imported $13 billion worth of food last year, a third
of all food consumed.

Following the devaluation, the U.S. lost little time in
offering food aid. The Department of Agriculture is
now working on final details of an aid package
valued at $885 million by USDA general sales
manager Chris Goldthwait.

The European Union was quick to follow.

After a meeting of farm ministers ended in Brussels
on Tuesday, EU farm chief Franz Fischler said a
proposal on a package including wheat, rye, beef,
pork, rice and milk powder would be issued within
two weeks.

But when Russia decided to accept food as payment
from Ukraine and Belarus for debts for natural gas,
questions arose whether Russia needed aid at all,
especially as Russian wheat exports, included in all
aid offers, were extremely high.

Sizov said this was inevitable as, although there was
clear demand for wheat on the home market, the fact
that there was no money to pay for it meant
producers had no option but to export.

This also meant producers would not have their
markets cut from under them by aid deliveries, as
they were not being paid in any case.

But he said grain traders would certainly suffer as
free food arrived.

''From the point of view of traders, it deprives them
of a market. These volumes, 500,000 tonnes of corn
and 250,000 tonnes of soya beans, are enormous,
they're twice Russia's annual imports,'' he said.

''If a Russian grain trading company had previously
been importing this, then their market has contracted
because of these deliveries. They will be left without
work,'' he said.

Traders also stood to suffer if Russia introduced
measures to limit exports, as donors have insisted
they do.

Sizov added that deliveries of corn, soya beans and
soya bean meal were particularly important for
Russia as they would help continue the recent
positive trend seen in the poultry sector, which Russia
has said it will target for support.

This is unlikely to be welcomed by U.S. poultry
farmers, who have seen their largest single market all
but disappear since the financial crisis started.

((Moscow Newsroom, +7095 941-8520
moscow.newsroom+reuters.com))
REUTERS SA PL

Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited.



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (42)11/28/1998 5:25:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 178
 
It is food "stupid"..

Ruling Party Defeated in India Vote

Saturday, 28 November 1998
N E W D E L H I , I N D I A (AP)

VOTERS HAVE rejected India's ruling party in three crucial state elections, a
rout that could destabilize the federal government.

After results were tallied Saturday, Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee
said voters who cast their ballots Wednesday appeared to want a change,
and admitted defeat for his his Bharatiya Janata Party in three of four states
to the opposition Congress party.

A regional party was leading in a fourth state, where the BJP did not
contest elections.

Vajpayee insisted the results would have no bearing on the stability of his
8-month-old federal government - but others saw the BJP's rout as a
referendum on its rule and said defeat could lead to infighting with its 18
coalition partners.

"It's clearly a vote against the BJP's policies, the poor performance of the
government," said Mamta Banerjee, a leader of the BJP-allied Trinamul
Congress, who said her party would stick with the BJP - for now.

There were even those in the BJP who hinted that the federal government's
performance was to blame.

"The voters did not defeat us; the BJP worked for its own defeat," said
Delhi's outgoing BJP chief minister, Sushma Swaraj.

It also was a key test for Congress' new leader, Sonia Gandhi, widow of
slain former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and torchbearer of the dynasty
that has ruled India for most of its 51 years of independence.

Gandhi has focused on rebuilding the Congress Party since she emerged
from seclusion early this year to campaign in national elections. She was
later named president of the party that was once led by her husband, his
mother Indira Gandhi, and Indira's father Jawaharlal Nehru.

Congress could win two-thirds of the seats in the states of Rajasthan and
New Delhi, hitherto considered the BJP strongholds. Bucking opinion
polls, the Congress also managed to retain power in the central state of
Madhya Pradesh. A regional party was likely to form a government in
Mizoram.

"The BJP has lost the goodwill of the people. Its eight-month-rule has been
marked by sheer incompetence, bickering and inability to govern," said
Natwar Singh, a Congress leader.

For now, Congress said it had no immediate plans to unseat the federal
government, although the victories might eventually prompt the party to
woo enough lawmakers in federal Parliament to unseat Vajpayee.

"This can't be put aside as a local issue," said Salman Khursheed, another
Congress leader. "This is an approval signal from the people."

More than 600 seats were contested in the voting for about 5,000
candidates from dozens of political parties. Final results were expected
early Sunday.

Skyrocketing prices for vegetables and foodgrain were the main issue,
wiping out any credit the BJP may have earned for the highly popular
nuclear tests it conducted in May.

The election was the first political test for the BJP since it took office eight
months ago.