Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (31368)	11/2/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: diana g	Respond to of 95453

<<<Off Topic>>> Slider, Since I more-or-less led a lynch mob against you in the past, I thought I should toss in my 2 cents worth here. LT certainly invites mockery with his self-important manner and posts referring to his '[undisclosed] Information' and '[undefined] Sources', and his denial of his own previous statements (as just seen here in classic form). IMHO it's quite appropriate to ask anyone to support any statement with facts and/or reasoning. And a bit of good-humored assault on someone's position is a useful thing. Sometimes it is difficult, when disputing someone's statement/position, to avoid saying things which might be, or be taken as, personal attacks. I had the impression that your recent posts re LT started out in friendly spirit, but you did get a little carried away, eh? OK, Maybe a little back-and-forth is fun, but enough is enough, yes? I suggest Moderation. Also-- I think you went out of your way to disparage entrails reading, which is a time-honored method of precognition and deserves more respect than you give it. Also-- My dog, Socrates, who Channels stock advice from a third century Tibetan monk (Alangee), was quite miffed by some things you said. I hope you will be more considerate of Socrates's feelings in future. regards, diana