Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Colin Cody who wrote (10062)	11/2/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: James Harold Alton	Respond to of 19331

Colin, I appreciate you play by play call on this AM's MM activity. I don't know if this will surprise you or not, but I agree with all of your comments in your last post. (G) James

To: Colin Cody who wrote (10062)	11/2/1998 10:46:00 AM
From: James Harold Alton	Respond to of 19331

Colin, How to you read HRZG, who is currently holding both the bid/ASK at $1.57/$1.60. It's unusual for me to see a MM also support the bid side after a nice move up on DCTC. James

To: Colin Cody who wrote (10062)	11/2/1998 12:41:00 PM
From: Pr-Ac Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

Colin: Your comments make perfect sense to me if a single MM was overseeing DCI. But what I don't understand is how this works when you have as many MM's as we do. Don't they have competing agendas? How can one MM control the price without some kind of coordinated effort with the others. For example, one MM may have a good supply, while another may have zilch. The first guy wants to create the impression that demand is high so that he can get a better price for his shares. The second MM wants to create the impression that there is an oversupply so people will start selling. Do MM's have some sort of unspoken agreement not to "burn" each other? I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks. PA