Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brian h who wrote (17535)	11/2/1998 11:50:00 AM
From: Mika Kukkanen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Brian H. - Don't twist statements to make double talk I know this subject brings a lot of emotion to the fore, it does with me. But let's take this in context. In reply: "Double talk to the most", the most of whom? As stated, yes IS-95 does work but it is behind on the technology curve. Do not confuse or TWIST the statements that I stated. First statement, above, as before. For example, the Nokia recent announcement is in the core architecture and that will lead on to incredibly small micro cells to facilitate any spectrum deficiency in the air interface over IS-95. Nokia have said that this could enhance capacity by a magnitude. Data and Internet have been a fact in my life for around 5 to 6 years already. The future requirements, i.e., will be more IP traffic. No one can seriously question that. 3G services take in to account of this, at least WCDMA does. That is why I stated that billing by minutes is irrelevant. The China element of my post is also beyond reproach. Globalstar is one thing and terrestrial services another. In my view they are complementary. Try not bring the Airbus vs Boeing argument in to this, it is a pet subject of mine and again, irrelevant (certainly to this thread). I await the changing tide, but it aint. Your colors show and blue aint that nice is it? Mika