Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (12227)	11/2/1998 9:57:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Somehow, better prenatal care doesn't seem to be much of a priority for the "right to life" crowd, at least compared to the PBA issue of the day. And somehow, the absense of any facts to support such an outrageous statement doesn't bother you Daniel, or the authors of the so-called statistics you present. Daniel: The hospitals and research hospitals are doing all they can in the area of prenatal care, and in fact have made great strides. "Right-to-life" people have all the motivation in the world to help these efforts, not hinder them, as the slimey piece of propaganda you posted supposed. In any event, there is nothing that Pro-life people could do to prevent prenatal research, even if they wanted to. One of my co-workers' wife had a baby at 26 weeks. It weighed 2.1 lbs, and after birth decreased to 1 lb 9 oz. That boy today is three or four years old, and healthy as a horse. Good thing his mother decided to keep him, rather than having his brains sucked out.