SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crossy who wrote (40669)11/2/1998 3:22:00 PM
From: Joey Smith  Respond to of 1577886
 
re:I actually referred to a FACT: both, INTC & AMD don't have experience in the high-end server RISC-CPU segment - simply because it's not their home turf. So this means INTC has no special "advantage" here. It's a level playing field. With CPQ on its side and by SHARING (not "copying" as You imply) their bus design, AMD might have a tactical edge. That's my feeling. Not more, not less.

I would hardly equate Intel's server experience with PPRO and now XEON with AMD's lack of ANY server experience and say it's a level playing field. Here is another example of Intel platforms slowly, but surely, eating its way into enterprise computing:

techweb.com
joey



To: Crossy who wrote (40669)11/3/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577886
 
Cross Y - Re: "With CPQ on its side and by SHARING (not "copying"
as You imply) their bus design, AMD might have a tactical edge."

Meanwhile, Compaq is selling the heck out of Intel-based Servers - Pentium II and XEON.

Paul