Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Ku who wrote (24175)	11/2/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: ToySoldier	Respond to of 42771

Gary, What a huge pile of crap your spewing! MSFT is the biggest and most aggressive proponent of the anti-piracy associations. They do everything in their power to go after pirates. they approach them kindly Who are you kidding? What a pile of crud. Your postings are starting to fill with more crud than Keithsha. WOW! Are we talking about the same company called MSFT? LOL!! Toy

To: Gary Ku who wrote (24175)	11/3/1998 8:18:00 AM
From: EPS	Respond to of 42771

Microsoft rewrites its own history By John C. Dvorak, PC Magazine October 13, 1998 9:59 AM PT The recent assertions that Microsoft had its current Internet strategy in play as early as December 1993 are utter nonsense, although the company was apparently beginning to become aware of the Internet in early 1994. Microsoft had an executive retreat two days after Netscape was founded, on April 6, 1994, but there's no evidence that this led to any serious effort. I say this because if you follow Gates's column in The New York Times and his speeches, which are posted on Microsoft's Web site, you'll notice he seemed nonplussed by the Net until late 1995. By early 1996 he became a fanatic. It all began with two memos that floated around the company in early 1994 proclaiming the Net to be the next big thing. These memos by (then) genuinely low-level employees are interesting, but they are hardly convincing evidence that Microsoft took the Net seriously. Shortly after the April 6 retreat, Microsoft began talks to license the browser already developed by Spyglass. It was as if the company wanted to have something ready just in case. But if Gates had sincerely considered the Net important, then Microsoft would have developed a browser in-house in no time at all. Version 1.0 browsers were not complex code. Over seven months later, despite the fact that most of the world was turning toward the Net, Gates gave his fanciful "Information at Your Fingertips" speech at Fall Comdex. Throughout the speech, he mentioned the word Internet once--and only in passing. He instead harped on how CD-ROMs would rule the earth. Throughout much of 1995, Microsoft was still clueless, at least in the executive suites. The company was banking on the success of MSN, an online service. Peter Lewis's column in The New York Times on February 26, 1995, on "making Microsoft the king of the online universe" discussed Microsoft's game plan, as implemented by MSN's honcho at the time, Russ Siegelman. The litany was that "tens of millions of personal computers around the world that now use Microsoft software will be connected to a network that both embraces the global Internet and rivals it in size. Although on-line information competitors like America Online, CompuServe and Prodigy have taken nearly a decade to amass an estimated total of six million subscribers, Microsoft hopes to overtake them all within a year of its scheduled launch in August." At that time, MSN--not a browser--was going to be built into Microsoft Windows 95. Everyone was freaked about Microsoft getting into the online business. The same Times column quoted newsletter pundit Jeff Tarter as saying, "My guess is that the Internet will vanish almost as quickly as it surged into prominence. I think The Microsoft Network is going to be the Internet of 1996." This kind of nonsense was swallowed whole by Microsoft executives. There was no way the company was going to take the Internet seriously! Earlier the same month, Bill gave a speech to his old high school. He was still proclaiming the CD-ROM revolution, twice referring to the Internet as "that thing called the Internet," as if it were an inconsequential bug or something. It was August 1995 when things changed. Netscape became public, and Jim Clark became an instant billionaire. More important, on August 8, 1995, the front page of Forbes ASAP read "Netscape's Marc Andreeson: George Gilder thinks this kid can topple Bill Gates." This was during the peak of Gilder's cult of personality. When he spoke, people listened. Microsoft must have freaked at this turn of events. Within months, the Internet was emphasized in every Gates speech. MSN's flop just made him more frantic. This was combined with dubious assertions by Netscape execs about burying Microsoft somehow. Talk soon emerged about making an OS from the browser. Quite a stretch, but apparently not enough to keep Gates from taking it seriously. On May 30, 1996, Gates spoke at M.I.T., and the dream of the CD-ROM revolution and his conception of the Internet and browser technology had changed drastically. Here he was freaking out over another imagined threat: "Is Netscape an operating-system competitor? Absolutely, even though what they sell today is not an operating system; it is going to be an operating system." Over two years have passed, and I'm still waiting for this imaginary Netscape OS. It was bull, and so is Microsoft's attempt to rewrite history.

To: Gary Ku who wrote (24175)	11/3/1998 8:54:00 AM
From: EPS	Respond to of 42771

Gary, Further your education and read this post. BTW while reading replace T with NOVL and repeat. Message 6263567

To: Gary Ku who wrote (24175)	11/3/1998 4:09:00 PM
From: DavidD	Respond to of 42771

>>Wins lawsuits; lose friends, collect dusts; lose potential markets. After you win the lawsuit, the losing party will be out of business. The are not going to pay you anything and will become your potential enemies. The markets created by them for you will be lost as well. What will MSFT do in case like these? It will corporate with the counterfeiter by giving them free this time and get their customer base. That's how MSFT grows stronger all the time. That is what you wrote, Gary. Keep on embarrassing yourself, it's fun to watch! ----------------------- Microsoft Sues Seven Texas Companies For Piracy DALLAS (Reuters) - Software giant Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq:MSFT - news) said it has filed lawsuits against seven Texas companies alleging infringement of Microsoft copyrights and trademarks. Six of the seven are also alleged to have distributed counterfeit versions of the Microsoft products Windows 95 and Office Professional 97. The suits, which Microsoft said resulted from tips to its ''Anti-Piracy Hotline,'' were filed October 27 in federal courts in Dallas and Houston. Microsoft itself is the target of a lawsuit filed by the U. S. Justice Department and 20 states alleging violations of antitrust laws. Molly Richard of the Dallas law firm Strasberger & Price was quoted by Microsoft as saying, ''Law enforcement action against software piracy and the theft of intellectual property is clearly on the rise.'' She said Texas law enforcement agencies and the Federal Bureau of Investigation had recently raided so-called ''swap meets'' in the state and discovered counterfeit Microsoft software. Microsoft said in a statement that it had received some 2, 000 calls and e-mail messages a month to its ''Anti-Piracy Hotline'' from customers or ''honest'' resellers. Named in the suits filed last week were SMI Liquidation Inc. , Essex Computers Inc., Biway International Technology Inc., ACS Technology Inc., CPU Distributing Inc., Megadyne Co., and AR Technologies Inc. All are alleged to have infringed Microsoft copyrights and trademarks. All except Megadyne are also alleged to have distributed counterfeit versions of Microsoft products. AR Technologies is alleged to have sold computer systems with unauthorized copies of Windows 95 and Office Professional 97 installed -- a practice known as ''hard disk loading.'' Microsoft said hard disk loading, counterfeit distribution by resellers, and unauthorized multiple installations of software in businesses are the three most prevalent forms of software piracy. Mohammad Issa, president of Essex Computers, told Reuters he was seeking legal advice and intended to fight the Microsoft lawsuit. He said his company had not intended to sell counterfeit Microsoft products and had purchased equipment in good faith from distributors. Similarly, a spokesman for Biway said there had been no intent to sell counterfeit Microsoft products. He said Biway had been cooperating with Microsoft sales representatives to identify counterfeits. Spokesmen for the other five companies sued by Microsoft were not immediately available for comment.