SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (12466)11/3/1998 12:22:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
In any case I would like to point out that for a long time I think the people here thought I was making these arguments in favor of working moms vs. stay at home moms for myself. In fact that is not true, I was coerced into a discussion about this once by that trickster Dwight.

heh...he is a crafty ol' devil, aint 'e? 'e was wunderin' 'bout that, so 'e figgered if 'e presumed something, a clarification might be forthcoming from Ms. Harris.

I personally doubt I will ever achieve anything in my life more important than having a child.

ahh...that's like music to my ears...and you know what, I knew it. I knew that if you had genuine nealthy normal female hormones, that would be the case. It just took a bit of coaxing to bring that out. Glad to see we're on the same page.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (12466)11/3/1998 1:41:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Respond to of 67261
 
>Johannes, first of all, you are an eloquent writer, however I as a technical writer have difficulty discerning the most important points from your posts. Im used to brief soundbytes I suppose.<

Perhaps. I merely put it as it comes. I will try and edit better for you.

>In any case I would like to point out that for a long time I think the people here thought I was making these arguments in favor of working moms vs. stay at home moms for myself. In fact that is not true, I was coerced into a discussion about this once by that trickster Dwight. I personally doubt I will ever achieve anything in my life more important than having a child.<

The various points here are irrelevant.

>However some people that have been dear to me in the past have achieved things that I feel were more significant, and I am actually arguing for them. Thats why I feel so strongly on this issue, and it changes matters.<

Yes, and you are insulted by a statement to the effect that motherhood is the most important job in the world. The problem here is no doubt many people have mothers dear to them who, in the past, have achieved things as a result of their motherly roles, that they feel are more significant than being a scientist or an astronaut. Perhaps I am actually arguing for them.

As a young child I once participated in a piano competition for which I had worked nearly a year, practicing every day for hours. My instructor had thought it was a good idea (as I had never done such a thing) and so he gave me the requirements of the competition. I was terribly excited and deeply motivated to practice. On the day of the competition, my mother drove me to the competition site and then remained outside as I entered the concert hall. I eventually received the signal to begin, and I started to play. After a few seconds, I was stopped by one of the judges. I looked up to see all the judges frowning and looking at various pieces of music. The judge who stopped me stood, and told me I was playing the wrong music. After informing me what I should play, he then sat down. I was in shock, having never even heard of the piece until that moment. The judges waited, and all I can remember is my ambling nervously over the keys, doing the best I could to sight-read the work. I really hardly remember this. I washed out. It was a dismal performance.

I stumbled toward the door, and then entered the hallway where I saw my mother. She must have seen by the look on my face that something dreadful had happened because she hurried to me with a worried expression. While at first I was too shocked to cry, when she held me I felt her to be a total refuge. I just melted into her and let go. My mom and I went home and I cried pretty much the whole day. I had no desire to play or do anything.

I would have given up forever, but the following week my mom delivered to me the requirements for the following year's competition. After a time she convinced me to sit at the keyboard to try again. I started all over again, practicing every day for another whole year, my mom encouraging me every single step of the way. The competition date finally arrived, mom drove me to the site and I entered the concert hall. I began to play, and this time, no one stopped me. When I left the concert hall and my mom saw me, she was crying and said, "You did it, just as I said you would." And without having seen the final results, she was right. I won the thing hands down. In fact, from that time onward, I won every single time I entered, besting everyone in my state. I have now long since abandoned musical training. I play strictly for pleasure, occasionally playing with friends, etc. But the lessons and encouragement of my mom have infiltrated my whole life. I have won more things than I can remember, not merely in music, but in other areas as well. My mom taught me that I can do whatever I want, I merely need work hard at it. My mom taught me this.

A few years ago I grew weary of being a computer idiot, having people tell me about my systems, not having the foggiest idea what they were saying. So I decided to learn more about computer systems. I now know quite a bit about them, having even set up a heterogenous (Unix, Novell and NT) network in my home with my children. A few of my sons are programming wizards. I wanted to know more in this area. So I read several books, and eventually learned C++ and the Windows 95 API. I can now program a microcomputer in C++, and even as you read this am writing a WIN32 system for my own pleasure. I boast here in my mom. She taught me. It was no female scientist or astronaut (these females are really quite worthless in my estimation). It was good ol' mom. Mom, not Sally Ride, but mom told me that I could do whatever I want to do, and she backed up her words with sacrifices that I could see on a daily basis. So your dear ones may think they or someone else has contributed more than my mom because they flew on a rocket, but they are wrong because my mom through me has now created six additional children each of whom now believe they can accomplish anything in this blessed world they want to accomplish. And those six will no doubt pass this to their children, and so on and so on... So there are your female scientists and rocket riders. My mom will give them to you.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (12466)11/3/1998 8:12:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
November 3, 1998

Eroding Elections

While everyone wrings their hands a lot these days about voter
turnout, there is a real and present danger that voter fraud is slowly
undermining the legitimacy of more and more elections. "Voter fraud is much
more common than people believe, because they think it no longer exists,"
says the University of Virginia's Larry Sabato. "The fraud perpetrators
depend on people remaining unaware."

As CBS's "60 Minutes" pointed out on Sunday, security procedures have not
kept pace with efforts to make voting easier. Since almost all states operate
on the honor system and don't require photo ID, it's fairly easy to vote in the
name of dead people, vote if you're an illegal alien, falsify an absentee ballot
or vote more than once.

Two years ago, groups using federal funds registered hundreds of
non-citizens in Orange County, Calif. The House Oversight Committee found
that at least 747 votes were cast illegally in the photo-finish election of
Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez, who won by only 984 votes. But little has
changed. House Oversight came up with the names of 1,499 voters who
should be removed from the rolls, but election officials claim it's too late to
purge them for today's election. This month, the Los Angeles County registrar
identified 16,000 phony registrations submitted by two groups aligned with the
Democratic Party.

Some Hispanic groups say efforts to tighten voter registration are
discriminatory, but Texas Secretary of State Al Gonzales disagrees. His
office has taken steps to rid the state's rolls of 74,000 duplicate voters and
43,000 others who may have died. He plans to ask the legislature next year
for authority to curb mail-in ballot abuses.

Mr. Gonzales has seen how easy it is for politics to get in the way of attempts
to curb voter fraud. Last year, the Immigration and Naturalization Service's
Dallas office ran a random computer check of voter registration records with
citizenship records. Of 400 registered voters, 10 weren't citizens, or 2.5%. At
that point, the INS's district director stopped the probe and the Associated
Press reported that internal memos "suggested the inquiry was stifled because
of superiors' concerns about 'political ramifications.' " No wonder. INS
officials presided over shocking lapses in "Citizenship U.S.A.," a crash
program to clear immigration bottlenecks that resulted in 180,000 people
becoming citizens without proper background checks before the 1996
election. It was later found that at least 5,000 of these new citizens had been
arrested for felonies.

Given this record, you'd think the Clinton Justice Department would be eager
to help states police voter fraud. Instead, it is actively thwarting them through
a recent ruling that bars states from verifying voters' citizenship. "I don't
know how the Justice Department can say that non-citizens shouldn't vote
and then block them from checking on what the status of a voter is," says
Abigail Thernstrom, an expert on the Voting Rights Act.

Justice has also been of little help to Florida officials. Democratic Governor
Lawton Chiles signed into law restrictions on absentee ballots after 15 people
were arrested in connection with the 1997 Miami mayor's race and the
fraudulently elected incumbent was ousted from office. But the Justice
Department's civil rights division ruled that minorities are more likely to use
absentee ballots and that key elements of the new law were discriminatory
and "legally unenforceable."

Voter fraud also turns up in places without a lot of new citizens. Sean
Cavanagh, a Democratic supervisor in Fayette County, Pa., claims that
nursing home administrators frequently forge registrations and ballots under
residents' names. He is on the advisory board of the Voting Integrity Project,
a national group that this month sought to prevent Maryland from making bulk
mailings of absentee ballots to nursing homes. A federal judge acknowledged
the potential for abuse, but ruled there would be greater harm if voters didn't
receive ballots on time.

No doubt further evidence of voter fraud will emerge after today's election.
Congress may hold hearings, but it's hard to force the Justice Department to
focus on the issue so long as President Clinton wields his veto pen. Last
month, GOP Rep. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina sent Attorney General
Reno a letter noting his state was awash in gambling money. He asked that
election monitors be sent to prevent the kind of gambling-financed "vote
hauling" scandal that delayed resolution of Louisiana's 1996 U.S. Senate race
for a year. State Democratic Party chairman Dick Harpootlian joined him "in
asking Janet Reno to send someone down to watch what they do." As of
yesterday, Justice hadn't responded.

Justice seems to have an incomplete--and political--understanding of its role in
policing elections. The department's primary job is to preserve the integrity of
the election system, not let it slowly degrade.

interactive.wsj.com