Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brady B. who wrote (15163)	11/3/1998 9:03:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Food for thought. Zulu is a relatively new company. Correct? Although ESVS has existed for many years, its current business focus is identical to Zulu. So, therefore, ESVS in effect becomes a relatively new company. In other words, ESVS takes over not only the beauty of what the Zulu business plan represents, but it also gets all the baggage and warts associated with being a young upstart company. Thus, ESVS itself has become imperfect. Meanwhile, there is the whole idea of protecting trade secrets. Indeed, there are strong protections in our laws for this. And is there anyone out there who wouldn't agree that secrecy can sometimes be key towards an effective business strategy in a highly competitive--and, yes, manipulative (read advertising)--arena? Although, in my opinion, what we've experienced could have been considerably smoother and certainly more open, I think some of what we've encountered involves the above two conditions: a) a new company; and b) the need for secrecy. I detect a strong tendency to link what may well be practical business decisions onto the background of one of the individuals, namely Pat Hayton's. In other words, because Hayton's had legal wranglings in the past--I submit a lot of "dealmakers" have problems--speculation prevails that everything is not on the up and up, and thus a whole nefarious attitude then prevails toward the negative and much of the positive becomes lost. Yes, there are three ways of looking at something: 1) Close-mindedly. 2) Skeptically. 3) Openly. I prefer the third. Where there are questions, there are usually answers, and, yes, the skeptic has its role. But although the timing of the answers might not be to my own personal satisfaction (for example, I would have liked to have gone to LA by now), I still, nonetheless, hope to find the answers and hold out hope that there is an effective business strategy that will manifest itself in a reasonable length of time. So I leave you with: What is a reasonable length of time for ZuluGroup.com to become whole and assume a highly competitive position as an internet stock?