Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PaperChase who wrote (35188)	11/3/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 132070

Kind of a short 1/2 life on that news. How come MU didn't hit 45? I want my money back. <g>

To: PaperChase who wrote (35188)	11/5/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

PC, I saw that IC Insights story and it made no sense whatsover. The guy said seasonals weren't the reason for the uptick and then offered zero evidence to support that wrong conclusion. Then he said, "Semis, semis, rah, rah, rah, Send me money for spinning, sis, boom, bah." <G> These guys are real objective. Sort of like the Tobacco Industry Institute, who still think that cigarette smoking should be prescribed for lung ailments. The problem with Fleck is not his analysis, which is excellent, but his use of short sales. Puts would keep him rich. I am still holding off. Just when I think the Xmas lies have gotten as thick as they can get, a new batch rouses the herd. MB