SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Technologyguy who wrote (442)11/3/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: Intrepid1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
All, this article about Go2net was recently published in a Canadian publication called Canada Stockwatch.

Since I have not seen it anywhere here on S.I. here it is in its entirety. Note I believe this article was published in the print version of Canada Stockwatch and mass emailed to all their subcribers. If I am breaking any copyright laws I humbly apologize to Canada Stockwatch.


Date:
Mon, 02 Nov 1998 01:24:11 -0800
From:
list@canada-stockwatch.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Stockwatch: GO2NET
To:
pure_thing@yahoo.com

Blue sky in cyberspace for Internet IPOs

Tuesday Oct 27 1998

MARKET PONDERS CYBERHYPE IN U.S. INTERNET DEAL
by Stockwatch Business Reporter

Stock traders love the Internet for more than the information it
brings them about the stock market. The new medium also
brings them an abundant supply of new stocks to trade - and
trade they do, often unaffected by such triflings as revenue or
profit.

Taking centre stage this year have been initial public offerings
of website companies. In late September website auctioneer
eBay, Inc. surged to $47 3/8 (U.S.) from an initial $18 in its
first week of trading. In August website host GeoCities closed
up 120 per cent from its $17 offering price on its first day of
trade, at $37.32.
(All figures are in US dollars.)

Many of these Nasdaq-listed companies are semi-free
services whose income depends largely or even exclusively
on advertising. The undisputed leader of this sector is Yahoo!
Inc., trading around $128, whose share price soared from the
$30 range at the start of the year to just over $134 in
September, at which time it also boasted a market cap of more
than $12-billion. All that for a company which posted
consistent and convincing losses on its operations amid
fast-rising but still modest revenues of $114-million.

Few deals illustrate the wild valuations of this sector better
than the $37-million acquisition by go2net, Inc. of the No. 2
financial discussion-site host, Silicon Investor (SI), in June. SI
was founded in August 1995 in Overland Park, Kansas, and
for the year to Dec. 31, 1997 posted revenues of only
$558,091 with a net income of $169,440. In 1996, SI posted
revenues of $8,000 and a net loss of $132,663.

This year, however, SI's revenues have improved. In the three
months to March 31, 1998, the company generated $326,355
in revenues, producing a net income of $85,895.

In another deal involving an Internet discussion site,
Nasdaq-listed CMG Information Services on Oct. 1 invested
in financial message-board host Raging Bull, Inc. According
to published news reports, CMG took a 40 per cent stake for
between $1-million and $3-million, but a CMG spokesman
said the company took only a 12 per cent stake for an
undisclosed price, and that other companies bought in as well.
The total stake taken by all investors may have totalled 40 per
cent, the spokesman says.

CMG was attracted to Raging Bull because of its relatively
high No. 4 status in terms of the popularity of its financial
message-board chat groups - a market it clearly wanted to
enter. The pecking order for financial message-board
websites, according to CMG, is Yahoo!, Silicon Investor,
Motley Fool, and Raging Bull. Other sources, such as Red
Herring, place Motley Fool ahead of Silicon Investor in the
No. 2 spot. A source familiar with Internet discussion groups
says there are around a dozen such financial sites on the web.
go2net acquired SI by issuing 1.25-million shares at the
closing market price of $29.625 for gross proceeds of
$37-million. The merger consideration consisted of 1,238,043
shares of newly issued go2net common stock and 11,957 share
options, raising the total number of go2net shares to 4.5
million.

According to the merger agreement, which made SI a wholly
owned subsidiary of go2net, the term closing market price
referred to the average of the last quoted sale price of go2net
shares for 10 trading days over an agreed-to period. Chief
beneficiaries of the deal were founding brothers Brad and Jeff
Dryer, who were the dominant SI shareholders. The price of
go2net shares, is now around $21 on Nasdaq, but they did slip
to below $15 in recent weeks.

HIT COUNTS

SI has what go2net and the Internet industry in general wants
almost as much as money: visitors, and their user "hits." These
traffic statistics are valuable to commercial websites because
they can translate into advertising revenue.

For Seattle-based go2net, the friendly SI takeover, though
marvellously expensive, was a boost to its overall goal of
hosting a popular and market-targeted stable of interactive
websites.

Whether or not this addition to the go2net mix (which will
result in beneficial "synergy," according to president Russell
Horowitz) was worth $37-million is another matter. Of
course, go2net's tightly controlled shares voted to proceed
with the deal on June 22, and announcement of the merger on
April 23 sent its thinly held stock up $4.125 to $30.75.
Its recent price decline may reflect market conditions as much
as any disenchantment with high-priced Internet stocks.

In a May 1998 filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, go2net pegged SI's subscriber list at 60,000, a
current usage rate of over 100 million page views per month,
more than 100,000 unique visitors a day, around 75,000
postings a week, and a data base totalling more than four
million retrievable messages (a figure that now stands at six
million). go2net does not reveal how many of SI's subscribers
have paid the subscription fee or how many have cost-free
lifetime subscriptions. The filing says subscribers "in certain
cases" paid a lifetime membership to participate in SI's
financial discussions.

Initially, SI did not charge its members to post messages on its
site. A charge of $45 was introduced in April 1997, which
was later raised to $125, and now the charge is $100 for one
year or $200 for a full-service lifetime membership. Casual
viewers, called lurkers in Internet parlance, can read any of
the discussions without subscribing, and these viewers are
welcome because they provide SI with a further boost in terms
of overall hits.

By requiring a fee to participate, SI uniquely positions itself at
the quality end of the often rancorous stock-talk spectrum.
Presumably only serious investors, and possibly paid touts,
would want to part with $200 for the privilege of posting their
queries or words of advice about particular stocks. SI
specializes in discussions about technology stocks.

MORE TEA, LESS BEER

While this higher-brow approach appears to have resulted in a
somewhat more civilized and better-quality forum than some
others, many of SI's participants in at least one discussion
thread - the decidedly non-technological issue Crystallex
International, a Vancouver-based South American gold miner -
have routinely posted personal insults, libel, swear words,
and threats against other posters.

In August, poster Valuepro addresses "Wayne" on the
Crystallex forum: "You're full of c##p!" Later, Vancouverite
addresses Valupro: "Eat this, Jerry!" Legendary Crystallex
tout Avalon, who earlier posted 3,400 pro-Crystallex
messages on the competing StockHouse Online Journal site, in
July offered wise words to another poster on SI: "You are
fu%$ing pathetic and without a doubt the biggest LOSER I
have ever come across."

The lesson for SI is that its hoped-for tea room of sober and
measured exchange of views between small investors can just
as easily disintegrate into off-topic babble, haranguing and
personal attacks between those on the long and short side of a
stock. All this can add up to a sometimes unpleasant
experience along the lines of a down-market beer parlour at
closing time.

Then there are suspected on-line promoters who pose as
independent investors. This has the potential of turning off a
lot of forum participants because it is difficult to tell the
difference between a persistent company advocate who touts a
stock, such as Avalon, and an enthusiastic small shareholder
who does not.

All this becomes a lot worse when touts become aggressive
towards those who fail to fall in line with "correct" comments
about a stock and attempts are made - often successful - to
force out those who disagree with self-styled forums leaders.
SI webmistress Jill McKinney says the company does not
remove posters they suspect of being paid to tout stocks. "We
advise people to always do their own research and not
believe things they read on the boards," she told the Wall
Street Journal in July. Ms. McKinney's comments followed
revelation that one of its members was Daryn Fleming,
president of Wall Street West. Mr. Fleming's company is paid
to issue "buy" recommendations on the Internet, the Journal
reported.

'OUR BELOVED SI'

Generally, however, SI's discussion sites appear to be a cut
above the competitions' on a number of fronts - at least that's
what SI's legions of adoring fans believe. Not only does its
quality of posts win applause from its subscribers, but SI also
garners plaudits for its design, layout and the speed of its
servers. As a result, this has engendered a fierce loyalty
among its subscribers, who refer to the company as "our
beloved" Silicon Investor and who from time to time fret that
their favourite forum will change for the worse as a result of
go2net's ownership.

"There is no question or contest," wrote SI booster Prosperous
Soul on July 26. "SI is both leader and standard bearer when it
comes to postings, information, thread layout, design and ease
of navigation. Prosperous Soul goes on to say that SI, while
hosting stock "bashers," is still more civilized than Yahoo!,
"where stock bashers will say every nasty, filthy, dirty word
imaginable."

Another SI supporter, Robin Messing, notes that lengthy
messages can be posted on SI, but not so on Yahoo!. "Yahoo!
only lets you post messages that are a few paragraphs long,"
Mr. Messing says, adding that he has posted documents on SI
that are dozens of pages. Another, Henry Volquardsen, said on
July 27 that he has followed several stock threads on Yahoo!
and "found them to be infested with nonsense." Mr.
Volquardsen adds that he checks back at the Yahoo! forums
and "it seems to be getting worse and not better."
SI has discussion forums devoted to SI - seven in total - where
critics and supporters exchange views and information about
the company, its personnel and its forums. Many of the
comments made there criticize not only Yahoo! but other
competing forums, such as Raging Bull, where the most active
Crystallex discussion group is found. Cliff Daniels posted on
Oct. 2: "From past experience, Raving Bull (sic) is a place
where the hypsters in training often rendezvous in favour of
the ignore button," referring to RB's unique feature that blocks
out unwanted posters.

Cofounder Brad Dryer is a fixture on the Welcome to Silicon
Investor forum, answering questions about the service and
dealing with the occasional barb. One SI naysayer, Lisa, is
critical about many aspects of the company and has complaints
about everything from technical matters to her treatment by SI
staff and aspects of SI's promotional literature. She even
hinted that go2net's recent share price drop might be attributed
to the SI buyout.

COMPETING CLAIMS

Surprising claims about the popularity of competing sites
appear to be common in this industry. Vancouver-based
StockHouse, a financial-information site and discussion
forum, claims to receive 150 million hits per month from over
150,000 consistent users. StockHouse is a free service that
depends on advertising revenues.

Set up as a unit of Berwick Management, StockHouse claims
in its promotional literature that it hosts "the largest chat/forum
on the World Wide Web."

go2net makes a similar claim about Silicon Investor, claiming
in its promotional literature that SI is "the largest discussion
community on the Web." Further, go2net says SI holds the
"No. 1 market position for financial discussion both in terms
of quantity and quality of messages."

Irrespective of competing and conflicting claims in the market,
the SI acquisition brings to go2net a portion of the market -
financial discussion groups - where go2net had previously not
been a player. go2net attracted its customers with what it calls
a "network of websites," including a search-index guide
(MetaCrawler), a Java-based multiplayer on-line games
station (PlaySite), a financial-information site containing
proprietary and agency news (StockSite), which is being
amalgamated with SI, and a comparison-shopping service
(WebMarket).

StockSite is a lesser-known player among
financial-information websites but nevertheless was claimed
by go2net as having 150,000 unique users and a community of
one million. The new combined site will offer discussion,
proprietary market analysis, portfolio services, and charting.
Visitors to StockSite are linked to SI's discussion forums.
According to press reports, go2net says the acquisition of
Silicon Investor will boost total traffic to around 180 million
page views a month.

See next post for part 2



To: Technologyguy who wrote (442)11/3/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Intrepid1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
Part 2......................

SHORT OF ADS

For an industry that is centred on advertising, SI appears to be
lacking in that regard, in spite of its claims to primacy in stock
chat forums. For the year to Dec. 31, only $1 out of every $6
of SI's revenues came from the coveted ranks of ad revenues.
A total of $479,410 came from subscriber user fees while a
mere $78,681 in revenues resulted from ads in fiscal 1997.
A visit to the SI site now indicates a bigger push towards
advertising, with an ad-information link that boasts
remarkable viewership demographics. Among the highlights:
62 per cent of SI users (as opposed to members) have an
on-line trading account, 29 per cent are professionals, 80 per
cent travel at least once a month, while the median income
range is between $80,000 and $89,000.

go2net was established in February 1996 by Mr. Horowitz
and John Keister - six months after SI's founding by the Dryer
brothers.

In contrast to go2net's self-promotional hoopla, its balance
sheet does not present the kind of financial picture that usually
excites the market. In the year to Sept. 30, 1997 - the most
recent full year of reporting - go2net posted revenues of
$254,389 and a net loss of $1.7-million. In its first two years
of operation, to March 31, 1998, go2net generated a total of
$1.18-million in revenues.

Administration is go2net's biggest expense. At Sept. 30, 1997,
the company boasted 26 full-time employees and 10
independent contractors. (By May 1998 it numbered 43
full-time employees.)

In an Aug. 14, 1998 Form 10-Q disclosure, the combined
go2net-SI revenues for the nine months to June 1998 totalled
$2.8-million (separated as $1.8-million for go2net and
$1-million for SI). Net loss for the same period totalled
$2.1-million (a loss of $2.4-million for go2net and income of
$290,000 for SI).

As of June 30, 1998, go2net's accumulated deficit stood at
$4.5-million and the company warns that further deficits can
be expected. In its Aug. 14, 1998 filing, go2net states: "The
company currently intends to increase substantially its
operating expenses in order to, among other things, expand and
improve its Internet operations, fund increased advertising and
marketing efforts, expand and improve its Internet user support
capabilities and develop new Internet technologies,
applications and other products and services."

With around $10-million in cash remaining, go2net, like many
startups, may be in a race against time to secure convincing
market share and advertising revenues before its available
capital runs dry.

It was against this backdrop that investors greeted go2net with
rapture when it completed its IPO and listed on the Nasdaq
SmallCap Market in April 1997 at a price of $8 a share (it
switched to the Nasdaq National Market on Oct. 1, 1998).
With an initial 1.6 million shares issued, plus 240,000 shares
issued the next month, also at $8, the company took in around
$12.8-million after offering costs.

From $8, the stock soared, apparently fuelled by the euphoric
sentiment toward practically all Internet companies, peaking at
$39 in April 1998 soon after the SI merger was announced. It
has since retreated in line with a somewhat cooler Internet
market and at $21 is capitalized at just over $124-million.

INTERESTS POOLED

Immediately following the share transfer, the former
shareholders of SI would then hold 21.5 per cent of the issued
and outstanding shares of go2net. SI and its three employees
were to relocate into go2net's downtown Seattle offices.
As part of the purchase agreement, the Dryers plus SI
webmistress McKinney each signed three-year employment
agreements with go2net. The agreements ensured these key
personnel remained on board to serve the amalgamated
company during and after the transition.

go2net's financial adviser on the SI merger was regional
brokerage and investment banker Tucker Anthony Inc. of
Boston. Tucker Anthony is a member of the New York Stock
Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, and the NASD. The
brokerage's brief was to deliver a "fairness opinion"
regarding the terms of the proposed buyout.

According to Tucker Anthony, SI was fairly priced at
$37-million even though it is a company with revenues of only
around half a million dollars. "It is our opinion that the
consideration to be paid by the company pursuant to the
agreement is fair to the company's stockholders, from a
financial point of view, as of the date hereof," the brokerage
stated to the board in its April 22, 1998 opinion.

Based on the above valuation analysis, including historical
trading prices plus a number of other yard sticks that indicated
profitable "synergies", Tucker Anthony blessed the merger,
and was remunerated $125,000 for its efforts.

Tucker Anthony's brief did not include interviewing
management of the target firm - SI.

EXPERIENCE

go2net's three top officers are notably lacking in formal
technical expertise and experience. Only one has a formal
background in computer training. In addition, none of go2net's
senior management has any experience in selling advertising
on the Internet - or any other medium.

go2net's president Horowitz, 32, moved to Seattle after
serving as investor relations officer with his family's
company, the New York-based apparel supplier Active
Apparel Group. (His uncle, George Horowitz, is Active's
CEO.) Earlier, between 1992 and 1994, Mr. Horowitz was
Active's chief financial officer. Active, with annual revenues
of around $16-million, is listed on Nasdaq, where it trades at
a little under $1.

Mr. Horowitz does not appear to have any formal computer
training or experience working in the technology sector. In
March 1996, Mr. Horowitz established Xanthus Capital, a
Seattle-based merchant bank that focuses primarily on
developing companies in "emerging growth industries or
special situations." According to go2net's disclosures, Mr.
Horowitz's formal education includes a bachelor of arts in
economics from Columbia University's Columbia College, in
1988.
Mr. Horowitz owns 1.62-million shares of go2net. A May
1998 disclosure statement indicated management owned at
least 2.2 million shares of the company, which now has 5.9
million shares outstanding.

Cofounder John Keister, 31, go2net's chief operating officer
since its establishment, has some technical experience. After
graduating from Occidental College in 1989, Mr. Keister says
he managed the European marketing operations for a White
Plains, N.Y.-based export management company between
1992 and 1994. That year he made the leap to president, CEO
and director of Seattle-based software developer ViewCom
Technology International. Following that post he helped
establish go2net in 1996.

go2net's chief technology officer, Paul Phillips, 25, has a
technical background but not a great deal of experience. After
graduating from the University of Southern California at San
Diego in 1996 with a bachelor degree in computer science, he
stepped in as go2net's vice-president of technology in July that
year. Twelve months later he was named to his current post.

BIG-GUN RIVALS

Perhaps more worrying for those who back smaller players
such as go2net is that they exist in a market dominated by some
extremely large players with the resources to preserve and
even extend their domination. Internet companies with which
go2net compete include Microsoft, America Online, MGM
Interactive, Compuserve, Prodigy, Netscape Communications,
Time Warner, Yahoo!, Sportsline, Red Herring Direct, Wall
Street Journal Online and Wired Ventures. A go2net filing
indicates the company believes "many, if not all, of these
corporations also offer a wider range of products and
services" than its own.

On the other side are smaller start-ups that can launch
websites from basement operations with very little capital.
Raging Bull is one such example, which apparently came from
nowhere to a stock-discussion player in around a year by
word of mouth. (Raging Bull was established in September
1997 as a part-time hobby for three New Jersey college
students; full-time operations began in June, when its traffic
stood at a humble 100 unique visitors a day. Traffic now is a
reported 15,000 unique visitors a day.)

Further, a competent computer programmer can custom build
the heart of such a financial-information website - its
discussion forum - in a week or two. Give it a design, add
some news feeds and quotes, and the Internet's latest financial
attraction is ready to roll out on the information superhighway.
Another note of caution can be added about the Internet itself
as a medium that must compete with more traditional
advertising media. The Internet industry and its supporters say
the medium should ultimately be able to secure between three
and four per cent of the total U.S. ad revenue stream of
$100-billion, or between $3-billion and $4-billion.

While that may prove true, many others say such figures will
be difficult to maintain in a market that has so far disappointed
those who believed people would easily take to shopping by
mouse in virtual shopping malls. Consumers generally have
proved resistant to consuming via the computer except for
speciality items. Similarly, advertising on the Internet may be
limited to such speciality items as sales of compact discs,
rubber sunglasses, and (currently found on Yahoo!), an on-line
auction of Courtney Love's guitar.

In a disclosure, go2net itself concedes the acceptance of the
Internet among advertisers and advertising agencies is "highly
uncertain." Many such organizations have interests in
traditional advertising methods and have a built-in reluctance
to even try the new medium, it adds.

Further, many Internet users quickly tire of the flashing
advertising attractions of consumer-products companies
hawking their wares on the computer screen. As a result, many
Internet users instinctively block out these non-essential
viewings.

In response, website hosts are becoming more and more
creative in getting their ads onto computer screens. On Oct. 5,
go2net announced a deal with Conducent Techologies, Inc.
that will see the website host distribute familiar banner ads
for placement within financial applications for PCs. Called
"beyond the browser," the technology is said to be the first
time ads will appear incorporated into Windows applications.
Annoying ads will appear on a user's screen before, during
and after the application is used. The user can then click on the
banner to take him or her to the advertiser's website.

If all that is not enough to concern investors, consider that for
the year to Sept. 30, 1997, around 31 per cent of go2net's
revenues were generated from non-cash barter transactions.
The irony here is that many of these barter transactions are ad
swaps between competitors such as Yahoo!.

In a September report on U.S. Internet IPOs, the London-based
Economist newsmagazine expresses scepticism about the trend
in companies being launched without adequate preparation.
The Economist recalls a Doonsbury cartoon in which an
Internet entrepreneur explains to his astonished daughter that
profitability is for wimps. "It means your business plan wasn't
aggressive enough," he tells her.

The magazine sees more than a grain of truth in the man's
irony. "A sound business model, strong market position, good
management and a low cost of attracting and keeping
customers might sound like the least that firms should offer
potential investors," it comments. "But it is a tall order for
most of the dozen or so other Internet start-ups preparing for
an offering."

(c) Copyright 1998 Canjex Publishing Ltd.
canada-stockwatch.com

***************************************************************************
This bulletin is sponsored and has been sent to you for no charge.
THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY!
To remove yourself from this mailing list, access this URL:
canada-stockwatch.com
For more information about this service please contact the
advertising department at Stockwatch 800.268.NEWS or 604.687.1500
***************************************************************************