SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (35733)11/3/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Elwood - Way off topic

Since you posted the link a couple days back, did you see this??

Court OKs nude Dr. Laura
photos
By Courtney Macavinta
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
November 3, 1998, 12:15 p.m. PT

update How Could You Do That? and Ten Stupid
Things Women Do To Mess Up Their Lives are
just a few of the books by famed radio advice
queen Dr. Laura Schlessinger. But those words
may be coming back to haunt her.

In a blow to the 51-year-old radio personality, the
U.S. District Court of the Central District of
California gave the Internet Entertainment Group
(IEG) the green light to post nude photos of
Schlessinger that were taken when she was in her
20s, according to IEG.

Dr. Laura, as her 18 million daily listeners call her,
took IEG to court on Friday and Judge Dean
Pregerson temporarily barred the site from
publishing the photos. As reported, however, the
judge lifted the restraining order yesterday. The
photos now are back online and free to adult Net
users for the next week. IEG membership normally
costs $24.95 per month.

"We are free to put them back on the site. It is up
to judge to let the case go any further," said IEG
spokeswoman Heather Dalton. "We bought the
photos from [former Los Angeles radio talk show
host] Bill Balance and he had the copyright, which
the court recognized."

It is unclear how the publication of the photos will
affect Dr. Laura's bully pulpit. Schlessinger
preaches personal responsibility, is against divorce,
and pushes values such as abstinence before
marriage. She also tries to help her listeners avoid
sexually explicit content on the Net by offering them
the blocking program WebChaperone.

Schlessinger lawyers indicated that they will appeal
the ruling.

"We won round one on Friday, October 30. We
lost round two on November 2. Round three has
just began," Schlessinger's attorneys said in a
statement released today.

In a recent interview with Vanity Fair, a magazine
that has pointed out other apparent contradictions
in Schlessinger's life, she was quoted as saying she
had made mistakes in her life that "I regret and have
shame for."

The Dr. Laura controversy is not the first for IEG,
nor is this the first time the company has been taken
to court over celebrity-related material.

IEG is perhaps best known for making millions of
dollars from exclusive rights to distribute online a
sexually explicit home video of former Baywatch
star Pamela Anderson Lee and her rocker
husband, Tommy Lee. The Lees initially had sued
IEG to block sales of the video, but then cut a
non-disclosed deal allowing the company to
continue distributing it.

Yesterday, however, Pregerson also threw out the
Lees' lawsuit that alleged they gave IEG permission
only to publish the video on the Net--not to sell it
via CD-ROM, video cassette, and to hotel rooms
on a pay-per-view basis, according to States News
Service. An attorney for the Lees said they
probably will appeal that decision.

IEG has had mixed results in its battles to publish
celebrities' most intimate moments.sued IEG to
stop it from posting online a 45-minute sex video of
himself and the former TV star.

The judge granted Michaels a preliminary
injunction, pending a final decision. Michaels is
asking for $90 million in damages.

"Sexual relations are among the most personal and
intimate of acts," the judge wrote in his decision.
"The Court is not prepared to conclude that public
exposure of one sexual encounter forever removes
a person's privacy interest in all subsequent and
previous sexual encounters."

Reuters contributed to this report.

Related news stories
• Virginity Webcast a hoax July 22, 1998