SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Strauss who wrote (56941)11/3/1998 11:56:00 PM
From: AlanH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58727
 
Jim, re:IOM

My concern with IOM would not be with leadership, rather market space. Didn't these folks carve a point-in-time niche? In other words... if you had introduced similar technology, wouldn't you accept that "price" (or, cost-curve) would eventually collapse on your model? And, if so, would your diversification attempts match IOM?

Perhaps, the stock is tradable based on technicals, but IMO the fundamentals are dismal. JMO

Best wishes,
Alan



To: James Strauss who wrote (56941)11/4/1998 1:20:00 AM
From: Electric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58727
 
Jim,

I am the life boat before the Titanic, but I am sailing away for the stubborn upper class people that dont think the good ship can sink..lol

Comments...

IBM, their Prez was a big name and they hit a sweet spot in technology for the company, they also had a plan. Lets see what IOM's prez can do. Another thing, IBM is a gorilla with 10(I am guessing) areas of revenue generation. IOM has one.

P/E... A P/E of 175 is not normal for a growing company, it is normal for an internet stock. IOM has had its product line out there for how many years? They have been stumbling over their own feet and if the same happens to a differnent company, the same thing will happen.

Tell me what is going to make the sector all of a sudden have life support given to it? SYQT was a mere 5-10% of the market. What is likely to happen is people wanting an alternative will go to Sony. Also Sony has deeper pockets to spend on advertising.

I dont think there is a correlation between computer sales and Jaz drives, I dont own one, I rarely see computers with them.

Bottom line is the product is past its growth stages, and since the company has zero other products in the pipeline there isnt alot to gain.

The only hope that IOM has IMO (lol) is a reduction in spending, getting a grasp on costs.

Investors perceptions are fleeting. A quarter or two down the road when the Street expects more than a few pennys per share, and the Co misses again.. oopsey there goes IOM.

Get a bucket Jim.. I think you are taking water..

Just kidding of course.

Best of luck!!!

If you like the turnaround candidates, look at BOST, somthing tells me that they arent finished yet..



To: James Strauss who wrote (56941)11/4/1998 3:16:00 AM
From: Trey McAtee  Respond to of 58727
 
james--

zips wont be standard until the price comes down to 30 or less at retail.

one note...on IBM...gerstner was an extremely capable man...and the company had a tremendous amount of value locked into it. IOM doesnt have much more than storage and a decent brand.

good luck to all,
trey