SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (12717)11/4/1998 11:56:00 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I think Newt could serve the conservative cause better from outside government. The beltway pukes just hate his guts for some reason. I saw Broder on tv once spit out Newt's name like he was spitting out sour milk. You could just see his gorge rising as he talked about him.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (12717)11/4/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: zax  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Style over substance will win.

It was a simply a trap the repubs walked themselves directly into.

Quite honestly, perhaps the biggest anti-clintonite I know, who is a dear friend, has videotapes at home of himself getting blowjobs from secretaries in the office he works at (he owns the company).

Now you tell me.

Who the hell is is the hypocrite, amigo.

There is no such thing as a sin between two consenting adults. Some people have different values than others. They may not be yours or mine, but nonetheless if they aren't hurting anyone else you've no right to tell them they have "sinned against God".

Starr and Gingrich walked themselves and the republican party directly into a sucker punch.

DON'T EVER COME OFF AS "HOLIER THAN THOU", OR YOU WILL GET THE CRAP KICKED OUT OF YOU AT THE POLLS.

Capish?

Now go drink some vodka, smoke a dube, and think about how on earth your party is ever gonna get any respect ever again, friend, after the complete idiocy of leadership of late.

Regards,

-- Zax



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (12717)11/4/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Couldn't agree more. But the repub party doesn't have that many big teeth, wide smile types. I mean take a look at Dick Armey. Is he the most unappealing looking dude you've ever seen? Good ideas, yes. Bad delivery. Or as Michelle might say, ICK!

Yes, we need Largent. We need Watts. We need a woman in the leadership (but whom?). The repubs have 2 years. It is time to get started.

How much of a fight will Newt put up over the ouster?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News