Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (1063)	11/4/1998 5:32:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3282

Hi Bill. I made a square 500 meters on a side with a thickness of 200 meters. now 500 x 500 x 200= 50,000,000 cubic meters and the rock has a specific gravity of 2.7 and thus a cubic meter holds 2.7 metric tons or 3.24 short tons. This equals 162,000,000 short tons of rock. Why would you ever have used 500 x 500 x 200 when the published data says the anomaly is 300 metres long. The data + existing drill hole results indicate the anomaly in the 76-80 hole (east/west direction is at most 150 metres?? (I gave them credit for 200 metres) You have doubled the (present) known length of this deposit (300 vs 500) and you have more than tripled the width from (present) known data! please comment. the Chief