Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sand wedge who wrote (9240)	11/5/1998 8:49:00 AM
From: DRRISK	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11888

Hey Thread, Their talking about us are your ears itching: ROFLMAO. From the Know it all Bouhafa on AOL: "Boy, did you get that wrong! And I'm surprised that you did since I believe you were posting there at the time. The fact is that I was the one who was run off the SI board. I was subjected from day one to insults and innuendo...as were others who tried to have a civil discussion of AIPC. It even went so far as racist comments regarding my Arab back ground. Surely you remember that controversy. GENELAWYER does. I was called a "raghead" and, to their credit, many people strongly objected to that attack. Finally, I had had enough. I nnounced that I would no longer post on SI and invited shareholders without access to AOL to join an e-mail list. I promised to send them a weekly digest of interesting posts from AOL (yours have been included). Sixty shareholders responded. After I and others left, the SI board was dominated by a bunch of idiots...and a small group at that. Since you deal with "facts" I would have thought that you would have gotten this story straight." Update from Level II: The stock traded off from profit takers to 2 3/16 and rallied strongly into the close. I was most impressed by the fact that a "block trade for 72,800 shares went off @ 3:18 @ 2 9/32 while the Bid was @ 2 3/16 and the ask was @ 2 1/4. So it tells me, IMHO FWIW, that in order to get a big block you have to pay above the market and that we are under accumulation, especially when the traders take their profit and unload on the way up. The institutional money would appear to be waiting to accumulate those shares as weakness keys traders to unload and take their profit. I readily admit that I am an idiot but I still call SI home. DrRisk Good Luck all