To: Tim Hall who wrote (8207 ) 11/5/1998 12:17:00 AM From: d:oug Respond to of 14226
Tim, your posts have been objective and opinionated with a direction towards the view that you feel strongly that the desert dirt story of extracting pecious metals will never be realized. It has been easy for you to present objective facts simply because IPM, Maxam and GPGI have all to date not been able to deliver, and all have obtained a present low in stock price. OK. You hold no desert dirt stock, so you can be objective and take a "show me" attitude and even investigate and uncover and disclose facts, and "let the chips fall where they may". No problem, just so lies and 1/2 truths are not done. This is an public thread open in write mode to all SI members. Those who hold GPGI shares will ofcourse include some subjective thoughts along with objective ones. Those not holding GPGI should leave any subjective thoughts at those threads where they were created, else it may become difficult to know if the post written has GPGI in mind. With Dennis DeNoble's post of today, most, if not near all, of the concerns of the shareholders have been addressed in a positive way. For those that wanted a management shake-up, it seems that each has received enough verification of changes to see that movement has been made in the direction wanted. For some, too much, and for some, too little. But change for the better did happen. Dennis DeNoble did present the news release. Seems like he will remain. Will his role be more assertive and aggressive ? Mike McKay will, in my opinion, make that decision soon. And in my guess, the answer will be yes, and this will also address the official web site concern, and again in my opinion, the web site will reflect McKay's view on how this public company will be presented to the shareholders. Bottom line, if Mike McKay keeps Dennis DeNoble, then its because Mike feels Dennis will help GPGI. If you trust Mike, then should translate that to a trust in Dennis. I post this to you Tim, rather than popcorn lover Jack, because eventho I also eat enough popcorn per week to equate to average bag a day. But your post, below, popped me off. Tim Hall on Nov 4 1998 10:01PM EST Dennis, << Mr. Leece has experience in production methods used by GPGI>> Are you sure that this is accurate? What has GPGI produced so far? Do you mean that Mr. Leece is familiar with fertilizer production? thall Rather than do an objective remark, or even invoke subjective thoughts, you did a ridicule of information presented by Dennis. To me, that I found it to be distasteful is not a concern, but to receive this type of reply causes me to be distrustful of the sender. Only one explaination possible. Hidden agenda. If so, then all information has to be viewed as to advance your agenda. Like a chess game or poker game, where looking many moves ahead is required to end the game in success or victory. My guess, your hidden agenda is the one suggested many times, in that you have most of your friends in the mining industry related activity, and they would suffer if the desert dirt story came to be realized. Doug