SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (24560)11/5/1998 12:44:00 PM
From: Robert Rose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<My stores are having the best year ever and they even turn a profit. I do not have the
top line as does AMZN but Ido have a far better bottom line. AMZN's negative
tangible book value far exceeds my networth. That is scary.>

Glenn, congrats on your success this year. But don't you think it's possible that your goals for your business differ from Bezos' goals for his? If your goal was to become the WalMart of the Web, don't you think that you might have to invest such that you would post growing losses and negative tangible book value (I'm trusting you on this) for years before things turn around? Clearly, Wall Street and I believe that Bezos knows what he is doing.

What separates companies such as aol, yahoo, ebay and amzn from the second and lower tiers of the internet stock spectrum? The quality of their management. Yes, it is something of an article of faith to put amzn in this category at this time, just as it is something of an article of faith for you to focus on the existing financials of amzn and refuse to consider that the foundation for something far greater is being laid before your very eyes.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (24560)11/5/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
>>I know how to read and understand results. Clearly, you do not.

Current financial results taken out of context don't mean anything. Your interpretation of "results" would have kept you out of AOL's 17,000% advance.