SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (40903)11/5/1998 3:27:00 PM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Re. K6-3 will cost 50% more than K6-2
That's true , so it costs around $50 to produce .
What is the Celeron A cost ? $70 ?
Whereas the performance of K6-3 will be considerably higher .
This buffoons sure post a lot of hogwash !
Brian



To: Scumbria who wrote (40903)11/5/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: RDM  Respond to of 1573092
 
If it were not for the performance advantages of the K6-3, the most competitive package may be for a while to use a K6-2 with external cache. The external cache is agressively priced and supplied by several vendors.

I am not disappointed at the delay of the K6-3. It is not required right now, and probably will not generate add revenue with a high gross margin when it is available since it is only replacing sram supplied to the market at loss gross margin.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News