SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tero kuittinen who wrote (1138)11/5/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: gdichaz  Respond to of 34857
 
To Tero: As of now, no one rpt no one knows the scope and reach of the Microsoft / Qualcomm joint venture. This debate will have a better factual basis after next Tuesday's announcement and then experience following. You may be right that an open standard will be the eventual choice - but what will that be? The current Symbian approach as it is now, or a broader and/or converged approach? Maybe Symbian may be modified and evolve, maybe not. Same for MSFT/QCOM. We live in interesting times. Fun is this may well develop faster than the 3rd gen decision process. Two games to watch, no? Chaz



To: tero kuittinen who wrote (1138)11/5/1998 3:30:00 PM
From: DaveMG  Respond to of 34857
 
What I'm suggesting is really not so complicated. WINTEL would continue doing what it already does but instead of a wireline modem you would have a Q,or for that manner VLSI, LU, CDMA modem built into your laptop. Is it really such a big step for these guys to start building fancy telephones? I never hear DELL complaining about paying MSFT. MSFT has enabled the standarization you love. Also, Symbian is an alliance of competing manufacturers. Couldn't this also pose problems? I sense we're headed towards the WCDMA/CDMA2000 debate. It's conceivable that this MSFT alliance might give Q a bit more leverage than it had before. Of course we're all speculating since we don't really know what the scope of the arrangement is.

Dave