Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Aware, Inc. - Hot or cold IPO? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (4608)	11/10/1998 10:39:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9236

November 10, 1998 Network World Scott Bradner As a columnist for a technical publication, I am presented with a surfeit of opportunities to speak to marketing droids from companies that claim to have answers to questions I didn't even know I had. (A disclosure: I do try to arrange some of the visits for lunch time so I can at least get a few free meals out of the encounters.) From time to time, these meetings actually result in useful information. One such meeting took place two weeks ago when Rick Gilbert , CEO of digital subscriber line (DSL) equipment vendor Copper Mountain, came by. (Unfortunately, the only time that worked was early morning, so no free lunch.) I've been hearing horror stories for the past few years about the problems encountered when ISPs and other companies attempt to deploy various types of DSL connections to their customers. Particular problems have included difficulty in getting wires from the phone company that are clean enough to provide good performance and potentially severe cross talk that results from having more than one DSL link in the same cable bundle running down the street. I've also heard tell of significant distance limitations. Of course, the most severe challenge to DSL's future is that in general it is a technology empowered by the aggressive, innovative environment common among telephone companies. Not! DSL is seen by these companies as a technology for providing mixed voice and data services over the same line. As a result, the version of DSL they are working on uses ATM to multiplex the services and is tightly tied to the voice world. In addition, the same people in the telephone companies who brought you ISDN are involved in bringing you DSL. Now there's a potentially fatal burden if there ever was one. There seem to be dozens of DSL flavors, and not all of them have the same set of issues. ISDN DSL (IDSL) and Symmetric DSL (SDSL), t he types of DSL that Copper Mountain and others are promoting, use the same on-the-wire technology (2B1Q) that ISDN uses. This means, among other things, that the cross talk problems that plague some types of DSL are not a significant issue. The ability to run at a reasonable speed - 128K bit/sec over 22,000 feet of wire and faster over shorter cable runs - means far better coverage than DSL versions that have shorter limits. Over 99% of all customers are within 22,000 feet of a phone central office, and this percentage drops to less than 50% for 12,000 fe et. But the thing that seems most promising about the Copper Mountain approach is that the company sees this as a data service and not some mixed-media service. Copper Mountain is dealing with ISPs, not telephone companies, and uses frame-based transport rather than A TM. Frame-based is less expensive and less complex to deal with than ATM. DSL deployment numbers are still small, far smaller than cable modem deployment numbers, for example. But developments such as those taking place at Copper Mountain and perhaps the DSL-lite technology under development by Microsoft and others, may mean that DSL will have a better future than it has a present. Disclaimer: Harvard has a long history of dealing with the future but has no opinion on DSL technology. Bradner is a consultant with Harvard University's University Information Systems. He can be reached at sob@harvard.edu. <<Network World -- 11-09-98, p. 41>> [Copyright 1998, Network World]