Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Einstein who wrote (4699)	11/5/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

On this much I think we can all agree. Production Lith-poly batteries are the better "mousetrap" to the battery user community. At least for now, eh? Bottom line? If VLNC shows analysts a working production line spitting out those better mousetraps left and right....well....it shouldn't take much for them to put two-n-two together. The rest, as they say, could be history. Let's see how it goes... John~

To: Robert Einstein who wrote (4699)	11/5/1998 7:31:00 PM
From: jean1057	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

my advise to FMK...KEEP ON POSTING...your posts are pretty logical and I do agree with them ...the Insider buying was sure not to support the price..first it would have been to early for such action..and why should any insider put his money on the table just to protect the other shareholders??? then the 2 days volume of over 1 million shares traded was sure enough not from individual investors but from Institutions that have been convinced that the company is on track...suppose they went to NI... and a scenario for a lawsuit would be if the company would say that they have another 6 month postponement of production after they mentioned in the last cc that they are on the "cusp"...and not if they let Analysts visit the production line in NI... hope this thread is not getting out of hand just because of nervousness....and Mr EINSTEIN...please honor your name and post something of material value or something intelligent...this is not YAHOO board...please do not start trashing around...thank you..

To: Robert Einstein who wrote (4699)	11/5/1998 10:34:00 PM
From: wm sharp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Robert: Regarding your recent attention to "mouths" and "extremists," I trust the email referenced here by Visnic was purely fabrication? Message 5788560 Regardless, many of us - investors and company alike - have been through extended water torture with this venture. FMK is one of the very few who has remained a perfect gentleman throughout. These boards can be contrary indicators. I hope the animosity we've witnessed in recent months is just that. It may at last be time for a change of fortune. Primary beneficiaries (I hope): the company personnel who have persevered with the project over multiple years. Now THAT effort indeed dwarfs any ridiculous activities on the internet. IMO it's barely the same universe. A five-year veteran of Valence R&D, for example, probably reads these boards and just laughs, and laughs, and laughs.