Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (13218)	11/5/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 67261

Ha Ha Ha Ha Bill you know I was going to post that here too... but I decided not to, rats I had a better line than yours too. The good thing is, for cross posting that you cant get tossed.

To: Bill who wrote (13218)	11/5/1998 6:45:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Very sophisticated, Bill, you liar you. You would never engage in direct name calling, would you Bill? Like you did 4 hours into our initial dialogue: Yes, you are a partisan hater. Gingrich is running a professional non partisan inquiry, standing on the floor of the house shutting up Congressmen who want to rant about Clinton's misdeeds, and you produce an article with a bunch of unsubstantiated Gingrich bashing. Get on with your hateful life. (http://www2.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/s-22775/reply-468) Not your style, right Bill? You can't help it that anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot, can you, Bill. You're just so smart. Get on with your own hateful life, Bill. Newt seems to have acknowledged some error in his ways, but not you. Everybody who disagrees with you is still an idiot. In an indirect name calling sort of way, right, Bill? Or is that a third person kind of way, Bill? You're a liar, Bill. Go mail SI and tell them I said so.