SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Ounce who wrote (2786)11/5/1998 9:30:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
The real story may be the extent of the Leonid meteor shower in 1999. At this point, I don't believe the experts know how intense it may be, but I read somewhere that it could be more intense than this year's, which is supposed to "hit" at a rate of 15,000+ per hour (normal for the Leonid is about 300, if I remember right).

There indeed could be damage. While most of the particles are no bigger than a grain of sand, they are traveling at something like 55 times the speed of a bullet. I just hope it misses the Hubble!

By the way, the best show will be in Asia. Unfortunately, it'll be daylight in the States.

Ken



To: Bill Ounce who wrote (2786)11/6/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: Bill Ounce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
(so they say) Telephone firms ready for Y2K

news.com

Telephone companies around the world have taken sufficient
precautions to protect themselves from the millennium
computer bug, industry leaders told a conference on
yesterday.

[...]

However, other experts are not so sure.

Ross Anderson, of Cambridge University's Computer
Laboratory, told Reuters earlier this year, that there was a
big difference between the attitude of big companies like BT,
and countries like South Korea.

According to Anderson, BT bought telephone hardware in the
late 1980s and has spent around $829 million to thwart the
bug. South Korea bought similar equipment and has spent
nothing because it sees no problem.

"They can't both be right," Anderson said.