SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jopawa who wrote (9247)11/5/1998 9:16:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Respond to of 93625
 
John,

>>>However, if MU continues to drag their feet, fu&% 'em, it will be their ultimate loss. I don't think they will, because INTC right now is probably beating them over the head to get with it.

Read the Intel 13D, MU is no longer dragging thier feet <gg>

>>>but of course I'm long at 66 so I have to cling to something!
John/long and waiting to double up at 66 and no lower!

You are funny!. I bought more @ 64.5...

Read this Q&A session from the Intel 13D...it mentions a company asking Intel for money for test & assembly equip...
==============================================
Intel Investment in Micron Q&A and Positioning
Prepared by Bill Calder
October 16, 1998Background:
In a joint announcement today, Intel Corporation said that it will
make a $500 million equity investment in Micron Technology, Inc.
Intel's investment will support the development and supply of next
generation memory products and help drive PC industry growth by
accelerating the adoption of Direct RDRAM, a next-generation high-
speed memory interface technology.
Intel will acquire a non-voting stock right exchangeable for common
stock representing approximately 6 percent of Micron's outstanding
common stock. A non-voting stock right is a right that is granted
by the company, in this case Micron, which can then be exchanged
for common stock.
Intel historically has worked closely with manufacturers of dynamic
random access memory (DRAM). Currently, DRAM manufacturers are
experiencing a down cycle in what is typically a cyclical business.
This current cycle is driven primarily by active capacity expansion
coupled with lower demand for PC's and the Asian financial crisis.
These factors have combined to create an oversupply situation,
resulting in capital expenditure cutbacks by many of thesemanufacturers.
Intel has an interest in seeing that appropriate investments
continue in the memory business. We will invest $500 million in
Micron to support the development and supply of next generation
memory products, specifically Direct RDRAM, in support of Intel's
microprocessor roadmap.
The current state of the art memory technology is synchronous DRAM,
or SDRAM. The most likely performance architecture coming to market
in the next few years, and one that Intel supports, is Direct
RDRAM. Direct RDRAM is based on a high speed interface technology
developed by Rambus, Inc. and is available under license to DRAM
manufacturers. As processor performance increases and more and more
multimedia and 3D functions are incorporated, high-bandwidth
memories are essential to sustaining system performance.
As part of this investment, Micron will ramp Direct RDRAM as early
as the third quarter of 1999 and will provide industry leadership
in aggressively ramping supply of Direct RDRAM.Key Messages:<PAGE>
*The investment in Micron is part of Intel's strategy to support
the development and supply of next generation memory products and
to help drive PC industry growth by accelerating the adoption ofDirect RDRAM.
*Intel has historically worked closely with DRAM producers to
insure platform performance is not limited by DRAM capability oroutput.
* We believe Micron meets our strategic requirements and is
qualified to provide industry leadership in aggressively rampingsupply of RDRAM.
*We have no obligation to buy DRAM's or Direct RDRAM's from Micron
exclusively, nor is this an exclusive investment in Micron.Questions and Answers
Q1: Why did Intel make this investment in Micron?
A1: The investment in Micron is part of Intel's strategy to support
the development and supply of next generation memory products and
to help drive PC industry growth by accelerating the adoption of
Direct RDRAM. We believe Micron meets our strategic requirements to
provide industry leadership in aggressively ramping supply ofDirect RDRAM.
Q2: What about rumored investments in other DRAM suppliers?
A2: Intel is frequently having discussions with many companies. We
have a multifaceted relationships with many other suppliers, and we
work with them on a variety of levels. But we do not speculate
about possible future actions or reveal private business
discussions that may or may not take place.
Q3: What are the terms of the Micron Deal?
A3: Intel is investing $500 million in a stock right, exchangeable
to Micron common stock.
Q4: Beyond the investment, what other agreements are there ?
A4: Micron is committed to accelerated support, development, and
production of Direct RDRAM, and we expect these products to be
available for shipment as early as the third quarter of 1999. Intel
also has a call right on a percentage of capacity.
Q5: Will Intel have a seat on Micron's Board ?
A5: Intel has a right to propose a Board member, subject to
Micron's approval, but has no intention to do so at this time.
Q6: What is the extent of your relationship with DRAM
suppliers/Micron or otherwise ?
A6: We have a long history of working with DRAM manufacturers. We
typically share information on long range demand, our product
roadmap, and market direction.<PAGE>
Q7: How will the Micron deal affect your industry enabling efforts
with the other DRAM manufacturers?
A7: This agreement with Micron does not affect Intel's enabling
efforts. Our desire is to have adequate supply of high-performance
memory for Intel platforms. We will continue enabling activities
with the current DRAM manufacturers.
Q8: Would you do similar investments with other DRAM suppliers,
including suppliers in Asia ?
A8: We're always talking with many different companies but we can't
speculate on investment possibilities.
Q9: Why did you do this with Micron instead of a Korean DRAMsupplier ?
A9: We did this deal with Micron because we believe Micron meets
our strategic requirements and will be an industry leader in Direct
RDRAM. Intel routinely has discussions with many companies, in
Korea and elsewhere around the world. We will not comment on any
specific company, but will continue to make investment decisions
consistent with out strategic goals.
Q10: Does this mean you won't be doing business with any other DRAM
manufacturers ?
A10: No. We continue to work daily with key suppliers and business
partners in all aspects of our business. As a general rule, we
don't provide details on our arrangements with our customers or our
business partners.DRAM/RDRAM
Q11: How bad is the DRAM situation in Intel's opinion, are you
worried about immediate supply shortages ?
A11: The DRAM business is cyclical and the industry is in a
downcycle. We do not foresee immediate shortages.Q12: What is RDRAM ?
A12: RDRAM stands for Rambus DRAM and refers to Rambus Inc.'s high
speed interface technology. RDRAM is essentially a higher
performance DRAM and is available in three different types; Base
RDRAM, Concurrent RDRAM, and Direct RDRAM. Intel platforms use
Direct RDRAM. Rambus licenses this technology to DRAMmanufacturers.
Q13: Is this Intel investment related to RDRAMs?
A13: Yes. The investment in Micron is part of Intel's strategy to
support the development and supply of next generation memory
products and to help drive PC industry growth by accelerating the
adoption of Direct RDRAM.
Q14: Micron has to date not been a proponent of Direct RDRAM, whatchanged ?
A14: Micron has committed to Direct RDRAM and will use the Intel
investment to help accelerate the development and ramp of the
technology. We expect they will begin volume production in the
third quarter of 1999. You should ask Micron for further details.<PAGE>
Q15: Company x has asked Intel to help with the Direct RDRAM
investments for Assembly and Test, but they say there has been no progress.
What's that about ?
A15: We are always talking to many different companies but we don't
discuss details of those discussions.
Q16: Are you worried about the supply of Direct RDRAMs?
A16: The ramp of any new memory technology involves supply risk. We
believe that Micron will provide industry leadership in aggressively ramping
supply of Direct RDRAM.
Q17: Will Intel buy Direct RDRAM's or other DRAMs from Miconexclusively?
A17: Intel has no obligation to buy Direct RDRAM's or other DRAM's
from Micron exclusively.Other Terms/Agreement
Q18: How long does the agreement last ?A18: Five years.
Q19: Will Intel receive any discounted product pricing as part ofthis deal ?
A19: Intel will receive the same pricing consideration as other top
tier Micron customers.
Q20: Did Intel get a discount to the market value on the stockpurchase ?
A20: No, the price was based on Micron's closing price on October15, 1998.
Q21: Does this require Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) approval ?
A21: No. Intel is acquiring a non-voting stock right which does not
require HSR approval.Q22: What is a non-voting stock right?
A22: A non-voting stock right is a right that is granted by the
company, in this case Micron, which can then be exchanged for
common stock pending approval of the deal by Micron's Board ofDirectors.
Q23: Why are we using non-voting stock right ?
A23: The use of non-voting stock rights provided Intel and Micron
the greatest flexibility in structuring the investment.Miscellaneous
Q24: Does this mean that Micron will not work on SYNCLINKtechnology
A24: This deal does not preclude Micron from working on other
memory technologies. As to Micron's plan with respect to SLDRAM you
will have to ask Micron.Q25: Will this impact the Merced roadmap further?<PAGE>
A25: Merced is not dependent on any specific memory technology.
Q26: This looks like Intel may be using its resources to stifle
competition and innovation, particularly in those companies who
have not committed to RDRAM. Can you comment on that ?
A26: There are continually technology choices in the industry and
Intel and a number of major DRAM vendors believe RDRAM is the best
choice for delivering next generation performance. So obviously
RDRAM is the type of memory whose development and supply we would
support. While supply of high performance Direct RDRAM is important
to our roadmap, we are not seeking to hinder competition or
innovation with other memory suppliers. We have no obligation to
buy DRAM's or Direct RDRAM 's from Micron exclusively.





To: jopawa who wrote (9247)11/5/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Respond to of 93625
 
RMBS mention....

Taiwan draws shoppers for 0.25-micron capacity
By Anthony Cataldo and Mark Carroll
EE Times
(11/05/98, 5:38 p.m. EDT)

TOKYO — Citing a looming shortage of 0.25-micron capacity, NEC Corp. is in discussions with a number of dedicated foundries about the manufacture of NEC's most sophisticated logic devices. Among the companies in discussions are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and United Microelectronics Corp. (UMC) in Taiwan, and Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. in Singapore, said Hajime Sasaki, senior executive vice president of NEC, on Thursday (Nov. 5).

NEC's announcement comes as recently released figures suggest that Taiwan is increasing its spending on capital equipment and becoming a more important source of production capacity, while Japan and other regions continue to tighten their belts. Data presented by Applied Materials Inc. at this year's Semicon Taiwan98 suggests that spending on fab equipment in Taiwan may even surpass spending in Japan in 1999.

That NEC, the world's second largest chip manufacturer, would entrust a portion of its system-on-a-chip production to a dedicated foundry is strong evidence that foundries no longer take a back seat to vertically integrated device manufacturers when it comes to process technology. It also signals a possible shortage of 0.25-micron capacity among chip suppliers — including those with deep-pockets — after several years of playing conservative with capital spending.

Sasaki said NEC intends to outsource a portion of its 0.35-micron and 0.25-micron manufacturing, but most of the outside work will involve 0.25-micron process technology, because NEC's own 0.25-micron capacity is maxing out. "The foundries in Taiwan and Singapore have excess capacity for 0.25, but we are running very tight," Sasaki said.

Misao Higuchi, NEC's manager of memory engineering, said there are signs of a possible shortage of 0.25-micron capacity needed to produce some leading-edge parts, such as Direct Rambus DRAMs.


Excess capacity at foundries and pressure on NEC to reduce its own manufacturing costs make it practical for the company to tap foundries for capacity in lieu of making larger capital investments for more 0.25-micron capacity, Sasaki said. Earlier this year, the company announced that it had reduced capital spending by about $260 million and postponed equipment orders until next year for its newest 0.25-micron fab in Yamagata, Japan.

"We need to meet peak demand, but it doesn't make sense to invest for peak demand," Sasaki said.

Indeed, some evidence suggests that cutbacks in capital spending by large semiconductor manufacturers coupled with aggressive investments by foundries has created a situation of lopsided 0.25-micron capacity. As a result, large semiconductor companies find themselves negotiating with foundries.

"Right now, 0.25-micron [foundry capacity] is underutilized," said Brian Klene, vice president of worldwide marketing for Chartered Semiconductor. "Over the last two to three years a lot of IDMs [integrated device manufacturers] have been cutting capital expenditures, but foundries have trailed the semiconductor downturn by about a year. We are having more discussions with IDMs, and I think the prolonged downturn is accelerating the acceptance of the foundry model. And in the case of system-on-chip we're talking about leading-edge process technology."

Klene declined to discuss whether Chartered was in discussions with NEC.

Against this backdrop, Taiwan is the only major region of the world that is holding steady on capital equipment spending, rather than cutting back. "Taiwan in the future could become the second largest investor in fab capital expenditure in the world," said David Wang, senior vice president for Applied Materials (Santa Clara, Calif.). Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI), an industry association, estimates that fab equipment purchases in Taiwan will amount to about $4 billion this year. "That is about the same level of equipment purchases that Taiwan made in 1997," said John Schuler of SEMI.

In comparison, Japan's fab equipment tab fell from almost $7 billion in 1997 to just $5 billion this year. Equipment purchases in the United States also fell from about $9 billion in 1997 to a little over $8 billion this year. South Korea fell the furthest, according to SEMI, with 1997 purchases of about $2.5 billion plummeting this year to just over $1 billion.

Applied's data for next year shows that vendors in Taiwan will increase capital expenditures from $3.8 billion this year to $4.2 billion next year. In contrast, Applied said that Japan will spend $6 billion this year but only $4.9 billion in 1999.

"A $700 million difference is plus or minus the loading of one 8-inch fab," said a securities analyst in Taipei, Taiwan. "Given the vagaries of the world economy now, it could go either way. Taiwan could very well surpass Japan next year."

SEMI also presented data that shows purchases from Taiwan growing as a percentage of the world's $4.5 billion lithography equipment market, from 13.4 percent in 1997 to 16.5 percent this year. Meanwhile, Japan's share of the equipment segment fell from 22.9 percent in 1997 to 19.5 percent this year.

"Taiwan's investment in first generation DUV lithography equipment is significant," said Schuler. "Likewise, Taiwan's increased purchase of inspection/measurement equipment allows them to effectively move towards the successful production of smaller line width ICs. In contrast, the Japanese are cutting back on the necessary investment in DUV equipment. When an industry upturn comes, this trend could significantly help the Taiwanese and hinder the Japanese."