SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (40927)11/5/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573737
 
Paul- "With Standard cooling, an overclocked K6-2 at 450 MHz wouldn't even boot!
Cryogenic cooling was required to get the part to even BOOT at 450 MHz."

What speed is a K6-2 350 rated to run at? You and I know it isn't 450. WHO cares if a K6-2 350 won't run at 450??? It is designed to run at 350, and 350 only. Sure, overclockers may get it to run at 400, but there are no guarantees, only that it will run at 350.
You see, AMD is smart. Their processors are sold at the maximum MHz level that the chip will run at safe and stable. That way, AMD gets the full amount of money it can from each chip.
Intel, on the other hand, while not stupid, is not exactly smart either. Intel sells PII 300's that can easily be overclocked to 450MHz. They lose over a hundred dollars for each PII 300 chip someone buys expecting to run it at 450MHz. While that quantity is not much, every dollar counts, especially when your retail PC market share is eroding as time passes.
In this scenario, who's business plan makes more sense? AMD's or Intel's?

"AMD HAS TO REDESIGN THE K6-2 CORE or
the process - since Anand had to JACK UP THE VOLTAGE to 2.4 volts to get a
K6-2 to toggle at 400 MHz. "

Well, according to the website listed a few messages ago, the K6-2 ran at it normal voltage, 2.2, at 400MHz, the chip's rated speed, without a glitch.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (40927)11/6/1998 2:47:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573737
 
Paul,

It's pretty clear from his work that AMD HAS TO REDESIGN THE K6-2 CORE

Having spent some time around the microprocessor business, you undoubtably are aware that speedpath fixes go on continuously during the life of a processor. It would be somewhat inane to describe a few speedpath fixes as "redesigning the core".

Scumbria