Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (13367)	11/6/1998 8:34:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

A free ride? Why thank you, JLA, I enjoyed it immensely. As for bile, of course, there's always the classic "day in the life" file, but I'll get back to that. Question 1: No, the word "idiot" wasn't in there. A bit of semantic quibling there, I'd say. "You are pathetic. As usual, you don't know a damn thing." is the functional equivalent, most people would agree. Also well within the realm of "ad hominem ad nauseum". Question 2: I didn't say anything one way or the other about the Bush brothers. You guys never had a problem with rumors about Clinton, did you? Back to the bile issue. There's always this for inspiration. One day, JLA, and probably not one of your more voluminous ones. Heaven forbid anyone should make a "moral judgment". JLA Who me, watch your terminology. "Party hats" are condoms for the Clintonistas!! JLA Not an artful dodge. Not within your intellectual capacity as I suspected. JLA How about the money Bubba just wasted on his little China kow tow excursion? I guess if you are wasting the money on the PC liberal pet projects, its OK. JLA Very well said. Time for dougjn to label you as an extremist. Let me welcome you to the club. <ggg> JLA I don't think so Mr. Barry. Most people still think that perjury, obstruction, etc. ARE a big deal and most are smart enough to know this ain't about sex. JLA Unfortunately, you people have real trouble grasping the obvious. Hopefully in time even a Clinton apologist such as yourself will begin to understand it. I'm taking the same approach you take with small children and pets. Repetition seems to do the trick eventually. JLA Funny, I don't hear any cogent counterargument? What do you take issue with? Character doesn't matter? Perjury, etc. no big deal? Let's see the refutation Einstein. You are a pathetic excuse for a human. JLA It was no longer "private" once it became the subject of a lawsuit and once he put his hand on that Bible and swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The rest of your argument is just plain BS. JLA As I suspected, you are an intellectual coward as well. JLA I will issue you the same challenge I issued Mr. Schuh. Refute the post point by point. I doubt you can but make a try. JLA PS You will have company as he weasled out as well. No, there are not so many of these people. The impeachment hearings will be educational and they will move public opinion against Clinton just as happened in Watergate. JLA Not in my experience. JLA You can dish it out, JLA, that's for sure.

To: jlallen who wrote (13367)	11/6/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Welcome back JLA. Amazing that Schuh thinks simple arguments are somehow offensive insults. He posted these minor passages from you as if they were big bad slams against his righteous personal being. Heaven forbid anyone should make a "moral judgment". JLA Who me, watch your terminology. "Party hats" are condoms for the Clintonistas!! JLA How about the money Bubba just wasted on his little China kow tow excursion? I guess if you are wasting the money on the PC liberal pet projects, its OK. JLA Very well said. Time for dougjn to label you as an extremist. Let me welcome you to the club. <ggg> JLA I don't think so Mr. Barry. Most people still think that perjury, obstruction, etc. ARE a big deal and most are smart enough to know this ain't about sex. JLA Unfortunately, you people have real trouble grasping the obvious. Hopefully in time even a Clinton apologist such as yourself will begin to understand it. I'm taking the same approach you take with small children and pets. Repetition seems to do the trick eventually. JLA Funny, I don't hear any cogent counterargument? What do you take issue with? Character doesn't matter? Perjury, etc. no big deal? It was no longer "private" once it became the subject of a lawsuit and once he put his hand on that Bible and swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The rest of your argument is just plain BS. JLA I will issue you the same challenge I issued Mr. Schuh. Refute the post point by point. I doubt you can but make a try. JLA PS You will have company as he weasled out as well. No, there are not so many of these people. The impeachment hearings will be educational and they will move public opinion against Clinton just as happened in Watergate. JLA Not in my experience. JLA All but 3 of his re-quotes were regular dialog exchange of views between debaters. I think the dolt is just into VOLUME.