SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (2588)11/6/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: Joe Master  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8393
 
Well you are wrong on one thing. Go back and read the 10K in the section of prepaid royalties. The companies that have paid those do not have any recourse to recieve the royalties back if sales do not materialize. They defer this revenue in any event until the sales occur. At saome point if the sales do not occur they must show this as income at that point.

All of you can argue with me until you are blue in the face but read my lips:
the prepaid royalties are put on the balance sheet not the income statement.
The sale of new stock also goes to the balance sheet. There is no income effect.
Yes if they recieve a lump sum license fee they would take the expenses required to generate (legal and such) as a deductiona and show the balance as income. Period.



To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (2588)11/7/1998 11:50:00 PM
From: E Haiken  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8393
 
I assume that ECD sold stock of Ovonic Battery to Sanyo,
similar to the sale of stock to Honda a few years ago.
That transaction was accounting income to ECD, so I think
it is reasonable to assume that the current sale of Ovonic
stock to Sanyo will also be income to ECD.