SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mrknowitall who wrote (13474)11/6/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I'm sorry that I and the other idiots who appear to be the majority in this country disagree with your irrefutable correct opinion on this. Like I said, tell it to Newt or his successor. Crime of the century? Crime of the millennium? If you wish. The west is sunk, what can I say.

Cheers, Dan.



To: mrknowitall who wrote (13474)11/6/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
Glad to see you getting in the spirit of things, Mr. K. Sorry that your posts are not up to the proper ad hominem level of Bill Vaughn and jlallen, though. I'm sure you'll get there eventually.

I'm also sorry that Newt doesn't seem to agree with you about the necessity of continued saturation coverage of BJgate:

Taking his share of the blame for his party's losses, the Georgia Republican said he had misjudged how the public would recoil from the Clinton scandal and how the scandal would drown out other Republican themes. "I mean I totally underestimated the degree to which people would just get sick of 24-hour-a-day talk television and talk radio and then the degree to which this whole scandal became just sort of disgusting by sheer repetition," Gingrich said. (from nytimes.com ).