To: Harry_Behemoth who wrote (3957 ) 11/6/1998 9:35:00 PM From: VBroady Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5908
Rookie, Kigliaplat (?) was bought into back in 1996 - IDCN owns 20% and nows it profitable (?) -- checking into it now - 20% means they run and control, of course. The primary interest stock at .11 - that figures!! IDCN site now at: WWW.INDOCAN.COM I'm not upset about IDCN at <.03. Just an opportunity to buy some real cheap while everyone stews over the late drilling PR. Buy when everyone pissed (stock down), sell when everyone is happy (stock up), right?? Harley's buying REAL cheap!! Good job, you bottomfeeder!!! Got a REAL Harley? ... I've got a wannabe Shadow 1100 >> don't laugh too hard!! Rode it a whole 100 miles this year in soggy Portland. When will IDCN PR the start of drilling?? Who knows? Jeffrey can't say .. only via PR or at a minimum the website for info such as this -- which is a good thing. I've said it before: the real bargains will come after this PR. Just saying "we started drilling" isn't gonna get people running for their checkbooks. Bottomfeeder alert: Once again, it won't take much of an assay(s) to support .02-.03 stock price. Whether you think it (the assays) will be fabulous and the stock could be $1-$5 or some pie in the sky is your choice. At .02 -.03, this is a beaten down stock with a lot of impressive gains ahead. Remember IDCN was +.01 for a long time when they were essentially NOTHING. A small, producing garnet property next spring would support these prices -- with NO Isaacs gold. Bury your resentment for the stocks you bought at .09 and think about the here and now. Do the DD on IDCN, look at the .02-.03 price, and come to your own conclusions about the near future profit potential. Anyone selling at .02 right now is, well, nuts. I still say, IMO, everyone on this thread in IDCN will make a very good profit. Whether it will be an extreme profit remains to be seen - maybe yes, maybe no. The claims of this stock being in the $1-$5 range never did get my attention, anyway, let alone the ridiculous claims of $20-$50 value -- this just hurts the stock -- EXUBERANCE, I guess :). vb