Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (13520)	11/6/1998 6:41:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Those look like the leftist ads hominems he so greatly abhors. JLA

To: Bill who wrote (13520)	11/6/1998 7:37:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

Right, Bill. You got me started on the the righteous path, of course. Let's put a little context around that one, you liar. <<Oh, I don't know. No slur is too low in this forum, on one side anyway. After all, Hitler was a leftist, and we have no shame, unlike all the good Christians casting stones. Cheers, Dan, with love and kisses to Mr. Bill too. Facts indeed. >> While you're busy pontificating on the conflicts in your troubled life, how about an answer to my question. Where and when did George Bush lie under oath? (Remember thathateful wild ranting accusatory post of yours?) Just wondering. Reply # of 11708 Saying George Bush lied under oath is hateful ranting? Look, I'm not your shrink. Go rant to someone else. Just tell me when and where George Bush lied under oath, as you have alleged. So, you admit that you invented that stuff about Bush lying under oath. Is that what you're telling me? Are you telling this thread that you are a liar? Or are you telling this thread that you are ignorant? Nice tone. Again, take that to your shrink. What's this "I'll get back to you" stuff? You made a declarative statement and now you have to go back and look it up? Why don't you tell us what you meant by your statement that Bush lied under oath? Was it your lie or your ignorance that produced that bit of mythology? A person with integrity would have admitted he made up the statement, "and George Bush lied under oath." And an apology for being so blindly partisan that you lied to make a point would be in order. But liars beget liars, I guess. And people with no integrity are respected by the same. That explains your hateful existence. Have you no shame? Cease with the endless drivel and equivocating. You have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied when you said: "and Bush lied under oath." You can't even point to an instance where Bush was PUT UNDER OATH! Case closed. You lied. Admit it. Where is your integrity? And you complain about people attacking you? Who said this? Piece of garbage? Hate artist? Butthead? Pee in pants? You did. You're a real piece of work, liar. You lied about Bush lying under oath. You have no shame or integrity to admit it. And thank you for the "apology". Not only are you a piece of garbage, Bill, you're a lying piece of garbage. Sorry to see you "sinking to my level" again, the level it took you all of 4 hours to reach after our first discussion: To: Daniel Schuh (467 ) From: Bill Vaughn Sunday, Sep 20 1998 2:04PM ET Yes, you are a partisan hater. Gingrich is running a professional non partisan inquiry, standing on the floor of the house shutting up Congressmen who want to rant about Clinton's misdeeds, and you produce an article with a bunch of unsubstantiated Gingrich bashing. Get on with your hateful life. (http://www2.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/s-22775/reply-468) Somehow, you don't seem to have much desire to get on with your own hateful life, Bill. Why is that? Have you grown tired of preaching hatred of Clinton, so now you must turn to me again? It seems strange. If you start down that path of direct name calling, it will have a bad ending my friend. You're a liar, Bill. Tell it to Bob.