SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jacq who wrote (2594)11/7/1998 8:48:00 AM
From: fred whitridge  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8393
 
Battery Accountants:

Well golly! This is mysterious. The accounting i described previously was for a "primary" issuance of shares from Ovonic where the cash would have stayed within ovonic and presto, chango no income statement effect to either Ovonic or ECD. if indeed ECD is selling shares that it owns in Ovonic(a "secondary issuance"), i presume one of the very recent posts that this is a gain is correct. I shall look over the previous sales of stock and see how those were booked. Either way it would be nice of ECD to tell us now and not wait until 45 days after the next quarter end. Perhaps they'll let a little light under the bushel and let us unworthy shareholders know at the annual meeting. This is not particularly difficult to decipher once we have the information. And yes, it seems darned important to know if we're going to have a profitable quarter. Why then we could even start mulling over what it would take to have additional profitable quarters....

One private quizzling, complaining of a senior moment, wants to know whether the non-stock-purchase portion of the transaction was for a license or prepaid royalties. I think it is both. Mike Latas? Retiarius? I think previous deals often had the fee expressed as part license and part prepaid royalties. Certainly the balance sheet reads this way: one sees a decrease in prepaid royalties from period to period.