Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (3676)	11/6/1998 9:56:00 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4634

Any opinion how big the earnings share of the apple store-in-store business is. Or is it only that CPU receives some royalties for the apple venture? As for the dominance of Intel based machines, my guess is that CPU is not that dependent on selling apples. C. This is not to say that Macs were horrible machines. However is - CPU is a discounter and therefore will concentrate on low-cost, no hazzle business. Street talk in Europe is that Apple is not doing so well as purported and the IMac story is well exaggerated.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (3676)	11/7/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4634

Another great piece by Cramer: thestreet.com This article alone (a rewrite and explanation of his article about the reasons for the last Fed ease) is worth the price of subscription to TSC. This should be required reading by all small investors - particularly those that are wondering why shorting stocks in the current market is akin to peeing into a hurricane.