Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 246810 who wrote (3328)	11/7/1998 11:12:00 AM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32902

I assume SI spam means this as a measureable postability:...Also, I consider spam to be repetitive touting of an issue's virtues on many threads.>>>> Assuming You are ASSUMING the meaning of SI's definitions and how they will apply them... That is one of the problems with SI's terms of use...and just ONE reason why a reporter is following the way SI applies them.... Ask Cheeky how the word Spam was applied to him....and see if that fits in with your assumption...it didn't fit his assumption of the term SPAM <<<<<I don't think anyone using SI for the intended purpose would ever be censured.>>>> You would be wrong then... and i STILL can't get an answer on the term Libel ....do I have to get a court to issue a ruling before SI will enforce that particular terms of use...because if Bob won't address the issue of lies..then the next alternative is getting a court ruling.... btw2,...do you want someone libeling you all over SI with them doing nothing about it??? (since they have chosen to police SI) or will that be acceptable to you