SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13719)11/7/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I can't defend his conduct because it was wrong. However, the lady involved said the marriage was already over when Hyde entered the picture. (Not that you'd let the facts get in the way of course of your moral judgment. BTW, you keep making these moral judgments and you'll lose your liberal carrying card.) JLA



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13719)11/7/1998 5:44:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The difference is, Hyde is not under investigation for felony perjury, coaching witnesses, hiding gifts, and lying his ass off to any and everyone as to what happened, whether under oath or not.

"There was no inappropriate relationship, and I know the meaning of the word"...President Clinton, to Roll Call, on Jan. 21, 1998.

I guess that means that blow jobs in the Oval Office is par for Clinton's course.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13719)11/7/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
It's the purjury, witness tampering, obstruction of justice, and lying to the public. Last I checked, one of the counts drawn up for Clinton did not include lying to Hillary or to Chelsea.