Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (13742)	11/7/1998 11:48:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

Right, Dwight. We've attempted our substantive discussions, you and I. Perhaps you'd like to go into prenatal care versus neonatal care? Or fetal deaths versus maternal health risks in pregnancy? Or maybe Slade Gorton and "Forest Health Preservation" via clearcutting? Or perhaps the "slimey propaganda" in agi-usa.org, versus your continual recitation of certain gory horror stories? You want to compare posts citing "substantive" news stories? I've posted a few, you know. Of course, mainly that tacky disreputable NYT site, not local from local hero Drudge. Somehow, "liberal" though they may be, the NYT seems to have a little more depth in their coverage. I know you prefer the wide-ranging titillation of the Starr report for your information, though. Most people seem to have had enough of that one. And what was the deal with Marty "stalking" and "harassing" you anyway? Am I guilty of that now? Go tell Bob.