SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jay who wrote (13779)11/7/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 67261
 
Wow, that one was original, Jay. You wouldn't have happened to have been following the inimitable Mr. K's post also? Or the ever polite Mr. Vaughn, with his witty Gore tag?

I've posted negative things about Clinton, and nothing positive I can think of. I don't much like him, either. But, there's this little quote:

"I thought from day one, as I think today, that this was bad for the country," said one of Starr's defenders who now questions his tactics. "Sometimes you have to exercise prosecutorial discretion." Even though this defender of Starr said he believed the president was guilty of significant misconduct, he said, "the cost to the country far outweighs the value of proving it." (from nytimes.com

You want the Grand Inquisition to continue? Write your Congressman, tell him so. Indications are, plenty of people think enough is enough.



To: Jay who wrote (13779)11/8/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: mrknowitall  Respond to of 67261
 
Welcome to the fray, Jay. [Oh oh, poet police coming, I hear them just outside my window . . ]

No resume required; if we were to be able to find them, we'd see Carville's signature on monthly checks to Daniel. Helps to defray expenses for the extra phone line and all that fax paper they generate at his end. ;^)

Mr. K.