Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1610)	11/8/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: whiskeyjack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2251

George: What is your read on T.V. theory of a cone sheet at snap? How does CL186 tie into it? Do you class large stones> 1 carat and if Wsp has 3 rocks of about 25 carats, or more than 10% of the 200t sample, these results are enourmous and unusual nes pas? What mines would compare?TIA whiskeyjack

To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1610)	11/8/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: The Fix	Respond to of 2251

Hello George, What I would like to see addressed is something which only the Yellowknifers could comment on., and that is are there any aborignal claims on the Snap Lake property.,? From speaking with Randy or Sophie (I forget which one) over the summer, WSP had a Native Archaeologist in Camp at Snap Lake studying any old Sacred burial grounds around Snap. Randy is starting to cover all bases. IMHO the Natives will not be an issue in the NWT's. The EnviroMENTALists will be the stumbling block. Wasn't an aboriginal diamond valuation company set up recently? A British company owns 49% and 51% the Aboriginal peoples of the NWT's. fIXER