Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (21285)	11/8/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: ed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Ok! Ok! your thought is unlimited. Then pls answer my question first to show us you really understand something. Talking or personal attack is cheap!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well, you seemed to indicated that you had more understanding about the legal matter here than most of the people on the thread, could you pls do me a favor to specify any piece of hard evidence that showed Microsoft had violated the anti-trust law. Of course, do not provide your talking stories, or your own imagination or wishful thinking. And also pls define what is the anti-trust law means, before you provide any piece of solid evidence. The current DOJ case against Microsoft is anti consumers also, why ? let me explain to you . (See , when I said something , I always provide the reason why. Not just like someone just like a kid always insist that Microsoft had violated the anti-trust law without any reason or f evidence to back it up. When people ask them to provide evidence , they just got frustrated and start to play the personal attack games). As you know most of the application programs are ported to a certain OS. For the application software program developers, the nightmare is you have to port your program onto various platforms, this will increase the cost of development, and as a result the price of softwares. That is anti consumers.