Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Walsh who wrote (8304)	11/8/1998 8:48:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Bob, this is really my reply to Tim, but I'am doing it on your reply to Tim so that a reader can click on your post, and then Tim's. Tim, your post: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Bob Walsh (8286 ) From: Tim Hall Saturday, Nov 7 1998 6:47PM ET Reply # of 8304 I believe that assay was done by a Mr. Jordan in Henderson, Nevada. He has always had good luck finding pm's in his desert dirt assays. Tim <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Bob Walsh Sunday, Nov 8 1998 6:37PM ET Reply # of 8306 Tim, you are wrong. Mr. Greg Iseman performed the analysis under the direction and control of Brian Russell whose credentials/experience are beyond reproach. Regards, Bob >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim, you start your post with "I believe", and then after saying what you believe to be true, you add another simple comment that contains the type of "talk" to discredit and dump on a persons reputation. To me the phrase "I believe" is equalivant to the following: (1)I don't know for sure, so it may or may not be true. (2)I didn't check the facts before stating this, so don't really know. (3)It may not be true, but I won't check because I just want to put out this negative thought, and this way the truth won't hinder me. (4)Its ok that it is not true, and even if another corrects me, the negative second sentence was read by this thread, and thus got the negative "feel", which was my objective. (5)I doubt that its true, but if no one corrects this, then I got a free-be of a "put down" on GPGI, and this will increase the status I have of "knowing" stuff others don't want to know. So Tim, is Bob correct or not. I'am sure Bob know where the source of his info is from. Or do you think Bob's source is in error ? Tim, where did your source come from ? Maby from the "desire" to hurt GPGI ? If so, then this source is not a valid place to obtain info. No ? Doug

To: Bob Walsh who wrote (8304)	11/9/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Bob, Thanks for correcting me. Since the GPGI web site went down I can't check those old releases. As far as I am concerned, no one is beyond reproach. Mr. Jordan is a registered assayer in Arizona. But he specializes in DD's. I don't think Mr. Iseman is registered in Arizona and I think he works out of Utah but I could be wrong. Mr. Iseman also specializes in DD. If Mr. Russesll really wanted to convey knowlege and experience he would have used one of the better known registered labs. IMHO Tim