Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: san antonio group who wrote (8316)	11/9/1998 4:50:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

san antonio group, Its ok to me if some of my posts "doesn't make sense". Also ok to me if I'am wrong or in error or end up looking stupid. This is an open forum, only rules are those set by SI. Not a classroom, no leaders, no one in charge, no boss. Present yourself as you choose, in any manner you choose. Sometimes one may post to get a reaction, rather than give or ask for information. Like a hidden agenda. Could be to harm or to help or to hinder or confuse or even flush out the enemy, or wake up the friendly. For you to say "doesn't make sence" rather than "I disagree", tells me that you do not want a 2 way discussion. As for monday(today), I hope the share price of GPGI increases very much. I'am already in 3 other desert dirts, and buying GPGI is not necessary, or to put it another way, a success in any one will finally put an end to the GAME OVER shorters, and clear the air for the others to follow. Just one has to make significate money from the dirt, then as been said many times, new and big investment money will flow in big time, for all. The shorters keep harping for this thread to prove to them that Mike McKay's past work experience can be directly translated, as in to predict the future, of a success for GPGI. san antonio group, how have you addressed the shorters posts of the preceding paragraph ? Readers of this thread who do not post are waiting for a good and valid answer. A semi answer was given by me and Chuca pointing to a Mike McKay's past post where he identified himself to this thread. But correctly countered by the shorters was their reply "does not demonstrate how Mike McKay's experience translates into success for GPGI". So, san antonio group, do you have an answer ? But maby you should stop and take a step back. Maby you should first ask yourself if you have the correct question. Not do you understand the shorters question, but do you understand what the shorters want you to do with the question ? The shorters know that their question is invalid, as in unfair. That it would take very much time and effort to answer it, and along the way the shorters would be presented information by you that itself needs to be proven, and on and on. Like a cat chasing its tail, close, but just can't get it to happen. Like it can't be done. Not there to be done. Failure. So, what do the shorters want ? How do you answer them ? Brush them off, and tell them to get their own answer ? If so, then they get a victory by saying that you said Mike's past work experience will do such and such, but you cannot give any facts to support it except a partial resume on an old post. But if try and prove it, quagmire. So ? So, san antonio group, rather than dump on me and give out your, <<< Put up or shut up! >>> focus on those shorters, because they control your moves, to their advantage. You think you moved. No, they moved you. Doug