Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (13982)	11/9/1998 1:44:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michael,I can live with most of this post.Question, since abortion is an all or nothing situation how can the potential father play a roll in the decision making process? You certainly aren't proposing a veto are you? After all the pro choice stance is a woman controls her own body. Substituting the would be father for the government will not fly. pez

To: greenspirit who wrote (13982)	11/9/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

Parental notification is actually widely supported; I think it is the law in my state as a matter of fact. You are right; the problem is when you start saying everyone involved are murderers that you open up a can of worms; bad worms at that. The Pro Life movement has nobody to blame but themselves for supporting with their silence or vocally like Ish on this thread the extreme behavior of the fringe of the movement that has destroyed the entire movement in the eyes of the country. The country doesn't like terroist groups; in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Libya, or the USA.